Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Securities Regulation  >  Active or Passive Control
Active or Passive Control
Active or Passive Control Cartoons

Active or Passive Control

United States v. Leonard; determining relationship includes reasonable expectation of significant investor control, and not investment contract, courts look beyond formal terms of documents circumstances surrounding relationship.; passive.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Long Island Lighting Company v. Barbash
Long Island Lighting Company v. Barbash
Proxy regulations newspapers direct and indirect communications proxies.
In Re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litigation
In Re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litigation
Directors lack of independence.
Robinson v. Glynn
Robinson v. Glynn
Ordinary business transactions common characteristics of stock corporation limited liability company security.
In the Matter of Kevin Kunz
In the Matter of Kevin Kunz
Apparently separate securities offerings, single unified offering, single plan of financing made.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. GLT Dain Rauscher
Securities and Exchange Commission v. GLT Dain Rauscher
Securities professionals are held to a standard of reasonable prudence.
In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation
In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation
Underwriters performing a due-diligence investigation of two bond offerings by WorldCom, had a limited number of conversations with the stock issuer and its auditor, made only cursory inquiries, failed to look behind formulaic answers to questions.
Asher v. Baxter International, Inc.
Asher v. Baxter International, Inc.
Under the safe-harbor provision of 27A of the Securities and Exchange Act, forward-looking statements must be accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements that adequately identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ.
Nursing Home Pension Fund, Local 144 v. Oracle Corp.
Nursing Home Pension Fund, Local 144 v. Oracle Corp.
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act; Connect the inferences fraud Rule 10b-5. Allegations in the complaint, taken together, must give rise to an inference that the defendant acted with the requisite scienter of false statements, knowing.
Dura Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Broudo
Dura Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Broudo
Fraud on the market; In a securities fraud case, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant misrepresentations proximately caused the plaintiff economic loss.
Is Offering Public or Private
Is Offering Public or Private
Hyer v. Malouf; Whether an offering is public or private depends on whether the particular class of persons affected by the offering needs the protection of the 1933 Act.
Securities Laws and False Statements
Securities Laws and False Statements
Pugh v. Tribune Co.; A participant in a fraudulent scheme is not liable under the securities laws unless he or she had a role in preparing or disseminating false statements.
Domestic Transaction Under Exchange Act
Domestic Transaction Under Exchange Act
Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. Ficeto; a domestic transaction takes place when irrevocable liability is incurred or title is transferred within the United States. The Exchange Act.