Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia Cartoons

Atkins v. Virginia

Execution of mentally retarded person is unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. deterence; retribution.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Smith v. State
Smith v. State
Irresistable impulse test. Person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at time act was committed mental disease or defect caused lack of capacity to appreciate wrongfulness of conduct or conform his conduct to law. Substantial capacity.
People v. Lubow
People v. Lubow
Proof of the crime of solicitation is complete upon proof of the communication; it does not require an overt act in furtherance nor does it even require proof of delivery of the solicitation to the intended target; criminal solicitation.
Commonwealth v. McIlwain School Bus Lines
Commonwealth v. McIlwain School Bus Lines
Corporation may be held criminally liable for vehicular homicide when the definition of person in the homicide statute extends beyond that of natural person. Ultra vires.
Rex v. Chisser
Rex v. Chisser
Taking goods without paying for them is treated as a felony even though the store clerk voluntarily handed the merchandise to the customer for inspection as part of an anticipated transaction. Felleo amimo incohate.
Criminal Laws on Homosexuality
Criminal Laws on Homosexuality
Lawrence v. Texas, state laws criminalizing homosexual relations violate substantive due process.
Common Law Misdemeanors
Common Law Misdemeanors
Commonwealth v. Mochan, misdemeanors may arise under state common law, acts against the public morality, Lawrence v. Texas, homosexuality.
Hines v. State
Hines v. State
Felonies that create a foreseeable risk of death under the circumstances are inherently dangerous, justifying the felony-murder rule.
United States v. McDermott
United States v. McDermott
A conspiracy requires a unity of unlawful purpose between two or more individuals.
Brady v. United States
Brady v. United States
A guilty plea is not involuntary merely because it was entered into to avoid the possibility of the death penalty.
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
People v. Smith; second-degree felony murder conviction cannot stand when in it is based on a felony that is an integral part of the homicide and the evidence produced by the prosecution shows it to be an offense included in fact within homicide.
Involutarily Commit Sexual Predators
Involutarily Commit Sexual Predators
Kansas v. Hendricks; Where a civil commitment statute does not seek retribution or deterrence, it does not establish punitive criminal proceedings necessary to uphold double jeopardy and ex post facto claims.
Signing With A Fictitious Name
Signing With A Fictitious Name
United States v. Moore; signing for an express mail delivery with a fictitious name violates federal law.