Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Constitutional Law  >  Ban on Same Sex Marriage
Ban on Same Sex Marriage
Ban on Same Sex Marriage Cartoons

Ban on Same Sex Marriage

Perry v. Brown; Proposition 8; the U.S. Constitution requires a legitimate reason for the passage of a law that treats different classes of people differently; descrimination against gays and lesbians is not a legitimate purpose.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

The Selective Exclusiveness Test
The Selective Exclusiveness Test
Cooley v. Board of Wardens. The Commerce Clause does not block state regulation of local subject matter, but blocks any state commercial regualtion dealign with a national subject matter.
Stream Of Interstate Commerce
Stream Of Interstate Commerce
Philadelphia v. New Jersey. The Commerce clause protects other States from efforts by one State to isolate itself in the stream of interstate commerce from a problem shared by all, such as garbage.
Preemption Under The Supremacy Clause
Preemption Under The Supremacy Clause
Pacific Gas and Electric v. State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission; Preemption cases depend on how the court charcterizes the purposes of the state statute and the controlling federal statute. Supremacy Clause.
Presidential Immunity
Presidential Immunity
Clinton v. Jones; A sitting President does not enjoy temporary immunity from all civil lawsuits for his unofficial acts.
Gender Motivated Violence
Gender Motivated Violence
United States v. Morrison; Contress may not remedy the bias against victims of gender-motivated violence under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Speech Criticizing A Law Doesn't Break It
Speech Criticizing A Law Doesn't Break It
Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten; Speech criticizing a law may not be punished as encouraging the violation of the law unless the full meaning of the expression directly counsels or advises others to violate the last as it stands.
Obscenity
Obscenity
Miller v. Calfornia; Statutes barring obscenity must be drawn in enough detail to allow producers of obscenity to structure their conduct to comply with the law.
Indecent Words Regulation By The FCC
Indecent Words Regulation By The FCC
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation; Indecent words not used to express political or social opinions can, in the broadcast media, be left unprotected by the First Amendment and thereby be restricted by the government.
Symbolic Speech Expression
Symbolic Speech Expression
Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence; Symbolic expression is subject to reasonable time, place and manner restrictions if without reference to the content of the regulated speech, narrowly-tailored and leave ample alternative communication.
Freedom of Religion
Freedom of Religion
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah; Laws that restrict freedom of religious practice that are not of general application must be narrowly tailored to achieve an important and compelling governmental objective.
Governmental Action And Establishment Clause
Governmental Action And Establishment Clause
Lynch v. Donnelly; Governmental action that has either the purpose or effect of endorsing or disapproving a particular religion is in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Content Based Regulation of Speech
Content Based Regulation of Speech
Collin v. Smith; neo-Nazi group may parade through Holocaust survivor town; Free Speech; peaceful expression of unpopular or racist views; ACLU; content-based restriction legislation.