Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Breach of Duty
Breach of Duty
Breach of Duty Cartoons

Breach of Duty

Jones v. United States; must establish a duty before breach of duty can support a criminal conviction.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

State v. Hunter
State v. Hunter
Compulsion is not a defense to homicide charge unless charge is felony murder. Felony murder rule.
People v. Serravo
People v. Serravo
Applying statutory definition of insanity, right and wrong are measured by existing societal standards of morality rather defendant's personal and subjective understanding of illegality of act. Insane; insanity defense; not guilty by reason of insanity.
State v. Verive
State v. Verive
Conviction for conspiracy requires an agreement to commit a criminal act and some overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. Corroboration; double jeopardy clause; immunity; perjury.
Commonwealth v. McIlwain School Bus Lines
Commonwealth v. McIlwain School Bus Lines
Corporation may be held criminally liable for vehicular homicide when the definition of person in the homicide statute extends beyond that of natural person. Ultra vires.
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
In Re Winship, In juvenile court, guilt of criminal charges must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
General Deterrence and Sentencing
General Deterrence and Sentencing
United States v. Milken, individual deterrence, general deterrence, punishment, retribution, and rehabilitation, appropriate criminal sentence.
Mens Rae
Mens Rae
B (A Minor) v. Director of Public Prosecutions, Absent legislative direction, the common law presumes that an accused's honest belief that negates the requisite mens rea of the crime is a valid defense.
Hines v. State
Hines v. State
Felonies that create a foreseeable risk of death under the circumstances are inherently dangerous, justifying the felony-murder rule.
Linda R. S. v. Richard D.
Linda R. S. v. Richard D.
A plaintiff must have a sufficient stake in the outcome of a case to maintain standing.
Knowingly Commit Each Element of Offense
Knowingly Commit Each Element of Offense
Flores-Figueroa v. United States; Courts ordinarily read a phrase in a criminal statute that introduces the elements of a crime with the word "knowingly" as applying that word to each element of the offense; identity theft.
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Perez v. Cain; In a federal habeas proceeding, the standard is whether, after viewing evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Question of Possession
Question of Possession
State v. Barger; new technology complicates questions of possession sufficient to establish criminal liability.