Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Brown v. Ohio
Brown v. Ohio
Brown v. Ohio Cartoons

Brown v. Ohio

Double jeopardy. a conviction of a lesser-included offense precludes a subsequent prosecution for the greater offense even though the two actions occurred several days apart.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Idaho v. Wright
Idaho v. Wright
The admission at trial of hearsay statements does not violate confrontation clause as long as declarant is unavailable and statements are sufficiently reliable, based either on firmly rooted hearsay exception or other showings of trustworthiness.
Texas v. McCullough
Texas v. McCullough
The due process clause of the fourteenth amendment bars increased sentences on retrial that are motivated by vindictiveness on the part of the sentencing judge. Presumption.
Blockburger v. United States
Blockburger v. United States
Continuing offense; separate and distinct offenses, even if of the same nature, do not constitute a continuing offense, such as two sales of narcotics to the same purchaser, but at different times. The narcotics act penalizes each individual sale.
Smith v. Murray
Smith v. Murray
A habeas corpus petition should be dismissed if, in the absence of any cause or prejudice, the underlying constitutional claim was not first raised in a state proceeding on direct appeal.
Chavez v. Martinez
Chavez v. Martinez
Qualified immunity does not apply to deprivation of constitutional rights; coercive police interrogation resulting in statements not used at trial violates Constitution only if interrogator's conduct shocks the conscience.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Case
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Case
Rompilla v. Beard; capital defendant and family say no mitigating evidence, but defense lawyer must make reasonable efforts to obtain and review prosecution evidence of aggravation at sentencing phase of trial; death penalty.
Sixth Amendment Right to Representation of Counsel
Sixth Amendment Right to Representation of Counsel
United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez; wrongful denial of the right to counsel of the defendant's choosing is a structural error (fundamental error) not subject to harmless-error review; pro hac vice.
Appellate Court Review of Sentencing
Appellate Court Review of Sentencing
Rita v. United States; An appellate court may apply a non-binding presumption that a sentencing court's imposition of a within-Guidelines sentence is reasonable; presumption.
Knock and Announce
Knock and Announce
United States v. Banks; Fourth Amendment; officers knocked and announced and then forcibly entered after reasonable suspicion of exigency had ripened.
Attachment of Right To Counsel
Attachment of Right To Counsel
Rothgery v. Gillespie County. A criminal defendant's initial appearance before a judicial officer triggers the attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Brewer v. Williams and Michigan v. Jackson.
Age as Miranda Custody Factor
Age as Miranda Custody Factor
J.D.B. v. North Carolina; A child's age properly informs the Miranda custody analysis because children may not feel free to terminate interrogation.
Strickland
Strickland
Padilla v. Kentucky; a criminal defense attorney fails to provide effective assistance if the attorney misleads a noncitizen client regarding the removal consequences of a conviction. Strickland Sixth Amendment right to counsel.