Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Environmental Law  >  CERCLA Liability
CERCLA Liability
CERCLA Liability Cartoons

CERCLA Liability

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States; Mere knowledge that spills and leaks occur after the sale of a chemical product is insufficient for concluding the seller "arranged for" disposal of hazardous chemical for CERCLA liability.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
Injury in fact and redressability must be established even under a federal statute conferring a private cause of action, private right of action, standing, personal injury, public, injury in fact. Injury to the environment.
Michigan v. EPA
Michigan v. EPA
The EPA may consider both the health effects of pollution and the cost of abating it when determining whether a state SIP fails to comply with the Clean Air Act. One state cannot pollute a downwind state.
Engine Manufacturers Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
Engine Manufacturers Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
The Clean Air Act makes state standards governing or enforcing emissions limits preempted for sale or purchase of vehicles; preemption.
Rapanos v. United States
Rapanos v. United States
Navigable waters; The phrase the waters of the United States, as used in the Clean Water Act, includes only those relatively permanent or continuously flowing bodies of water forming geographic features; wetlands are not navigable waters.
South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians
South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians
Moving pollutants between bodies of water may not require a permit. The Clean Water Act requires a permit before a pollutant may be discharged into navigable waters.
EPA Has Discretion Regarding Standards
EPA Has Discretion Regarding Standards
Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA; he Clean Air Act only mandates that residual risk standards provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health, and the EPA is free to determine that existing technology-based standards are ample.
Apportion Liability
Apportion Liability
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States; CERCLA does not mandate joint and several liability; scope of liability must be determined from traditional and evolving principles of common law.
Greenhouse Gasses Are Pollutants
Greenhouse Gasses Are Pollutants
Massachusetts v. EPA Greenhouse gasses are pollutants that may be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
EPA Waiver of Preemption
EPA Waiver of Preemption
Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep, Inc. v. Goldstene; If the California motor vehicle emissions regulations are granted a waiver by the EPA to the Clean Air Act, enforcement is not prevented by the doctrine of conflict preemption or by express preemption.
No Trading of Pollution Credits
No Trading of Pollution Credits
North Carolina v. EPA; EPA is not properly exercising its duty under the Clean Air Interstate Rule unless it is promulgating a rule that achieves something measureable toward the goal of prohibiting sources within one state from affecting another state.
Political Question Doctrine
Political Question Doctrine
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, states can sue over global warming, case or controversy requirement. Environmental attorney. Damage to the environment.
Endangerment Finding
Endangerment Finding
Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. EPA; EPA endangerment finding for greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles supported by substantial record evidence, EPA obligated to issue greenhouse gas emissions standards. Endangerment evaluation.