Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Employment  >  Chao v. OSHRC (Erik K. Ho)
Chao v. OSHRC (Erik K. Ho)
Chao v. OSHRC (Erik K. Ho) Cartoons

Chao v. OSHRC (Erik K. Ho)

National labor market, interstate commerce, business actions, Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Curay-Cramer v. Ursuline Academy
Curay-Cramer v. Ursuline Academy
Religious employers not exempt from Title VII, anti-retaliation claims, religion clause, Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Employer access to emails received or sent at work, Electronic Communications Privacy Act.
Guess v. Sharp Manufacturing of America
Guess v. Sharp Manufacturing of America
An injury is compensable under workers compensation only if it arises out of and in the course of employment.
Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Co.
Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Co.
Workers compensation insurance, employee benefit plan, bankruptcy, ERISA, Chapter 11.
Quik'n Tasty Foods, Inc. v. Division of Employment Security
Quik'n Tasty Foods, Inc. v. Division of Employment Security
Good cause, attributable to the employer, constructive discharge.
Reed v. The Great Lakes Companies, Inc.
Reed v. The Great Lakes Companies, Inc.
Title VII forbids intentional discrimination on the basis of ones religion, affirmative duty, reasonably accommodate any bona fide religious beliefs.
Smith v. City of Jackson
Smith v. City of Jackson
Disparate-impact, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, disparate treatment, age discrimination case.
Springfield Rare Coin Galleries v. Mileham
Springfield Rare Coin Galleries v. Mileham
Customer information, confidential, restrictive covenant.
Vallone v. CNA Financial Corporation
Vallone v. CNA Financial Corporation
Presumption that benefit plans are not vested, withdrawal of benefits, lifetime benefits.
Impermissable Employer Questions Under the ADA
Impermissable Employer Questions Under the ADA
Harrison v. Benchmark Electronics Huntsville, Inc. Under the Americans Disabilities Act an employer may not conduct pre-offer medical examination or make inquiries of job applicant whether applicant.
Employers Can Prefer Certain Characteristics
Employers Can Prefer Certain Characteristics
EEOC v. Schneider National, Inc.; An employer is free to decide that some physical and mental characteristics that do not constitute an impairment are more or less preferable and may make individual employees more or less suitable for the job.
Shareholder Adoption of Bylaws
Shareholder Adoption of Bylaws
CA, Inc. v. AFSCME Employees Pension Plan; bylaws may be unilaterally adopted by shareholders only when they appropriately relate to corporate processes rather than substantive decisions and do not otherwise violate the law.