Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Chavez v. Martinez
Chavez v. Martinez
Chavez v. Martinez Cartoons

Chavez v. Martinez

Self-incrimination impossible when there is no trial; violation of right against self-incrimination occurs only when one is compelled to be a witness against himself in a criminal case.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Cruz v. New York
Cruz v. New York
When a non-testifying codefendant confession incriminating defendant is not directly admissible against defendant, the confrontation clause bars its admission at their joint trial, even if the jury is instructed not to consider it against the defendant.
Jackson v. Virginia
Jackson v. Virginia
A review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction requires a determination as to whether the record evidence could reasonably support a finding of guilt beyond a "reasonable doubt" standard.
United States v. Resendiz-Ponce
United States v. Resendiz-Ponce
United States v. Resendiz-Ponce; indictments need not ordinarily plead specific conduct by the defendant to be constitutional.
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause and Taped Testimony
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause and Taped Testimony
Crawford v. Washington; out-of-court statements are inadmissible into evidence if defendant has no opportunity to cross-examine speaker, unless witness is unavailable and defendant has prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant; hearsay.
Appellate Court Review of Sentencing
Appellate Court Review of Sentencing
Rita v. United States; An appellate court may apply a non-binding presumption that a sentencing court's imposition of a within-Guidelines sentence is reasonable; presumption.
Scope of Vehicle Search Incident to Arrest
Scope of Vehicle Search Incident to Arrest
Arizona v. Gant; Police may search vehicle incident to recent occupant's arrest only if arrestee is within reaching distance of passenger compartment at time of search and reasonable to believe vehicle contains evidence of offense of arrest.
Jurisdictional Defect
Jurisdictional Defect
United States v. Cotton; failure to state the amount of drugs in an indictment is not a jurisdictional defect.
Minimum Sentence Enhancement
Minimum Sentence Enhancement
Harris v. United States; fact that increase a minimum sentence do not need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Right to Counsel Class Action
Right to Counsel Class Action
Hurrell-Harring v. State of New York; class action permitted as state must provide legal representation to indigent criminal defendants at all critical stages of the proceedings against them.
Exigent Circumstances Rule
Exigent Circumstances Rule
Kentucky v. King; The exigent-circumstances rule applies only when the police do not gain entry to the premises by means of an actual or threatened violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Pretrial Publicity
Pretrial Publicity
Skilling v. United States; For purposes of obtaining a fair trial, it is sufficient if the jurors can lay aside their impressions or opinions and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.
Cheek Swab
Cheek Swab
Maryland v. King; taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee's DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, is a legitimate police booking procedure and is reasonable under the Four Amendment. DNA cheek swab.