Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Clark v. Arizona
Clark v. Arizona
Clark v. Arizona Cartoons

Clark v. Arizona

Mott Rule; mental illness short of insanity does not bear on mens rea according to Arizona state Mott Rule; court will not allow evidence of a mental disorder short of insanity as bearing on a defendant's capacity to form specific intent.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia
Execution of mentally retarded person is unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. deterence; retribution.
People v. Serravo
People v. Serravo
Applying statutory definition of insanity, right and wrong are measured by existing societal standards of morality rather defendant's personal and subjective understanding of illegality of act. Insane; insanity defense; not guilty by reason of insanity.
State v. Guthrie
State v. Guthrie
First Degree Murder; intent to kill must last for more than an instant; murder in the first degree consists of an intentional, deliberate, and premeditated killing, which means that the killing occurs after a period of time of prior consideration.
People v. Goetz
People v. Goetz
Self defense, The reasonableness of a belief in the need to use force is determined according to an objective standard, taking into account the circumstances or situation faced by the defendant.
Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller
Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller
Selective prosecution, courts are reluctant to interfere with prosecutorial discretion.
Blakely v. Washington
Blakely v. Washington
Determinate sentence, indeterminate sentence, sentencing guidelines, imposition of a sentence outside the statutory range based on facts never admitted nor put before a jury deprives a criminal defendant of his Sixth Amendment rights.
Uses or Carries Firearm in Drug Trafficing Crime
Uses or Carries Firearm in Drug Trafficing Crime
Muscarello v. United States; The word "carry," in ordinary sense includes carrying in car neither basic purpose nor legislative history 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) supports circumscribing scope word "carry" by applying "on the person" limitation; lenity.
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States; One knowingly corruptly persuades another person with intent to cause that person to withhold documents from, or alter documents for use in, an official proceeding only when conscious of wrongdoing.
Factors Determining If In Possession of Drugs
Factors Determining If In Possession of Drugs
Smith v. State; Several factors, no one of which is conclusive, determine if defendant was "in possession" of drugs: proximity, in plain view, indicia of mutual use and enjoyment, and ownership or possessory interest in location where discovered.
Death Penalty for Child Rape
Death Penalty for Child Rape
Kennedy v. Louisiana; court says child rape not heinous enough for the death penalty; disproportionate.
Attempted Murder
Attempted Murder
People v. Stone; an attempt to kill anyone is an attempted murder.
Continuous Conspiracy
Continuous Conspiracy
Pinkerton v. United States; When there is a continuous conspiracy, and no evidence of affirmative action to establish withdrawal, as long as the partnership in crime continues, the partners act for each other.