Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Commonwealth v. Mitchneck
Commonwealth v. Mitchneck
Commonwealth v. Mitchneck Cartoons

Commonwealth v. Mitchneck

Failing to pay money to a creditor under an agreement to pay the debt of another does not constitute fraudulent conversion, since the money at issue never belonged to the creditor; conversion novation.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia
Execution of mentally retarded person is unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. deterence; retribution.
The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens
The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens
Necessity does not justify killing another person who poses no danger. Assize.
State v. Ochoa
State v. Ochoa
Person is an aider and abettor if he shares the criminal intent of the principal and acts in concert with the principal; Abet; accesory; aid and abet; incite; riot.
United States v. Hilton Hotel Corp.
United States v. Hilton Hotel Corp.
Corporation cannot disown the criminal acts of its agents simply by making it company policy not to break the law; to do so would permit a corporate defendant to avoid responsibility for illegal conduct it actually condoned. Sherman antitrust act.
People v. Burton
People v. Burton
The underlying felony sufficient to trigger the felony-murder rule must involve an independent felonious purpose, lesser included offense.
People v. Goetz
People v. Goetz
Self defense, The reasonableness of a belief in the need to use force is determined according to an objective standard, taking into account the circumstances or situation faced by the defendant.
Linda R. S. v. Richard D.
Linda R. S. v. Richard D.
A plaintiff must have a sufficient stake in the outcome of a case to maintain standing.
Felony Murder Rule
Felony Murder Rule
People v. Cavitt; The felony-murder rule requires both a causal relationship and a temporal relationship between the underlying felony and the act resulting in death.
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States; One knowingly corruptly persuades another person with intent to cause that person to withhold documents from, or alter documents for use in, an official proceeding only when conscious of wrongdoing.
Mental Illness Evidence Does Not Bear On Mens Rea
Mental Illness Evidence Does Not Bear On Mens Rea
Clark v. Arizona; The defendant appealed from his murder conviction, arguing that evidence of his mental illness should have been considered with regard to his ability to form the necessary mens rea.
Unjustified Risk Taking
Unjustified Risk Taking
People v. Moore; defendant's driving created a sufficiently high probability of death for a second-degree murder conviction; the defendant was subjectively aware of the risk from prior DWI (driving while intoxicated).
Second Degree Murder
Second Degree Murder
People v. Chun; felony murder; assualtive felony that is inherently dangerous to life; second degree murder; felony murder rule; drive by shooting; accomplice liability.