Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Crawford v. Washington
Crawford v. Washington
Crawford v. Washington Cartoons

Crawford v. Washington

Sixth amendment confrontation clause demands, for an out of court statement to be admitted into evidence, the witness must be unavailable and defendant must have prior opportunity to cross examine the declarant. Cross examination; hearsay.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Williams v. New York
Williams v. New York
Imposition of death sentence for murder in the first degree is not void under due process clause solely because trial court considered additional information from probation department and other sources. Pre sentence investigaton.
McMillan v. Pennsylvania
McMillan v. Pennsylvania
Right to a jury trial is not violated by pennsylvania mandatory minimum sentencing act. may impose minimum upon finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, of certain facts. Defendant possessed a firearm during enumerated offense.
Koon v. United States
Koon v. United States
An appellate court should not review a district court sentencing departure decision de novo but instead should ask whether the sentencing court abused its discretion. Downward departure from sentencing guidelines.
Downum v. United States
Downum v. United States
If an impaneled jury is discharged because the prosecution witness is unavailable, double jeopardy applies to bar the impaneling of a second jury and a new trial. Impanel.
Teague v. Lane
Teague v. Lane
Procedural rules usually do not apply retroactively. new constitutional rules of criminal procedure will not be applicable to those cases that have become final before the new rules are announced. Ratio decidendi.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Case
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Case
Rompilla v. Beard; capital defendant and family say no mitigating evidence, but defense lawyer must make reasonable efforts to obtain and review prosecution evidence of aggravation at sentencing phase of trial; death penalty.
Police Searches Of Network Computers Require Warrant
Police Searches Of Network Computers Require Warrant
United States v. Heckenkamp; absent clear warnings, connecting a personal computer to a computer network does not relinquish an otherwise objectively reasonable expectation of privacy; warrantless search.
Fourth Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Bond v. United States; search warrant is required before police can physically manipulate items.
Right to Counsel Class Action
Right to Counsel Class Action
Hurrell-Harring v. State of New York; class action permitted as state must provide legal representation to indigent criminal defendants at all critical stages of the proceedings against them.
Fourth Amendment Search
Fourth Amendment Search
United States v. Jones; the definition of a Fourth Amendment "search" evolves with advances in technology. GPS. Karo. Katz.
Joinder of Criminal Charges
Joinder of Criminal Charges
State v. Pereira; joinder of offenses; joinder of criminal charges with multiple offenses is proper when the offenses charged are of similar character or are based on the same act or transaction or parts of a common scheme or plan.
Double Jeopardy Clause
Double Jeopardy Clause
Renico v. Lett; trail judge is entitled to deference in declaring a mistrial due to jury deadlock.

Browse Similar Items