Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company
Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company
Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company Cartoons

Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company

Ancient document. Hearsay evidence may be admissible if there is no other way of proving facts in hearsay statement and if there are circumstances that show evidence is trustworthy enough without need for cross examination.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Lilly v. Virginia
Lilly v. Virginia
A hearsay exception is regarded as firmly rooted if, in light of longstanding legislative and judicial experience, the admission of virtually any evidence under that exception comports with substance of Confrontation Clause.
Gray v. Maryland
Gray v. Maryland
Redacted confession of co-defendant that replaces defendant's name with an obvious indication of deletion is inadmissible. Redaction.
Simms v. Dixon
Simms v. Dixon
Foundation; authentication. Photograph is authenticated for evidentiary purposes if witness with knowledge of facts is able to testify that photograph is correct portrayal of those facts. Foundation.
Wagner v. State
Wagner v. State
Silent witness theory. Pictorial evidence is admissible if there is an adequate foundation attesting to accuracy of process that produced image.
Blackmon v. State
Blackmon v. State
Attorney client privilege. In order for statement to attorney to be confidential, client must reasonably intend that communication be confidential.
United States v. Zolin
United States v. Zolin
Court should undertake in camera review of evidence to determine if crime fraud exception will bar claim of attorney client privilege only if there is factual showing adequate to support good faith belief that review may reveal evidence of fraud.
Tilton v. Beecher
Tilton v. Beecher
The marital privilege protects the marriage relationship.
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause
Crawford v. Washington; for out-of-court statement to be admitted into evidence, the witness must be unavailable and the defendant must have had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.
Journalists Must Reveal Sources To Grand Juries
Journalists Must Reveal Sources To Grand Juries
In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller; no First Amendment privilege that protects journalists from providing evidence to a grand jury.
Crime Fraud Exception
Crime Fraud Exception
United States v. Zolin; The court should undertake an in camera review of evidence to determine if the crime-fraud exception will bar a claim of attorney-client privilege.
Improper Testimony
Improper Testimony
United States v. Moore; admission of improper testimony does not always result in reversal of conviction; inadmissible evidence; appeal; corroborating evidence.
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Williams v. Illinois; Confrontation Clause; admission of DNA evidence; laboratory report; forensics report; DNA match; sexual assualt medical evidence.