Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Defendant Consent to Unrepresented Interrogation
Defendant Consent to Unrepresented Interrogation
Defendant Consent to Unrepresented Interrogation Cartoons

Defendant Consent to Unrepresented Interrogation

Montejo v. Louisiana; A criminal defendant's consent to police-initiated interrogation cannot be presumed involuntary simply because the court previously appointed a lawyer to represent him; preliminary hearing.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Gray v. Maryland
Gray v. Maryland
The use of blanks or deleted references in a redacted confession of a co-defendant may not be offered against a defendant at a joint trial, even with a limiting instruction. Redaction.
Texas v. McCullough
Texas v. McCullough
The due process clause of the fourteenth amendment bars increased sentences on retrial that are motivated by vindictiveness on the part of the sentencing judge. Presumption.
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
Highway checkpoints are unconstitutional when used for ordinary law enforcement purposes to advance a general interest in ordinary crime control.
Search of Incident to Mistaken Arrest
Search of Incident to Mistaken Arrest
Herring v. United States; The exclusionary rule is not an individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable police deterrence; respondeat superior.
Issue Preclusion Analysis for Double Jeapardy
Issue Preclusion Analysis for Double Jeapardy
Yeager v. United States; Although acquittals may preclude retrial on counts on which the same jury hangs, the consideration of hung counts has no place in the issue preclusion analysis for double jeopardy purposes; hung jury.
Fourth Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Bond v. United States; search warrant is required before police can physically manipulate items.
Knock and Announce
Knock and Announce
United States v. Banks; Fourth Amendment; officers knocked and announced and then forcibly entered after reasonable suspicion of exigency had ripened.
Attachment of Right To Counsel
Attachment of Right To Counsel
Rothgery v. Gillespie County. A criminal defendant's initial appearance before a judicial officer triggers the attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Brewer v. Williams and Michigan v. Jackson.
Reasonably Effective Assistance of Counsel
Reasonably Effective Assistance of Counsel
Harrington v. Richter; An unreasonable application of federal law is different from an incorrect application. State courts must be given some leeway. Strickland v. Washington. Strickland standard.
Invoke Miranda Rights
Invoke Miranda Rights
Berghuis v. Thompkins; a suspect invoking his Miranda rights must do so unambiguously.
Pretrial Publicity
Pretrial Publicity
Skilling v. United States; For purposes of obtaining a fair trial, it is sufficient if the jurors can lay aside their impressions or opinions and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.
Eyewitness Identification
Eyewitness Identification
Perry v. New Hampshire; suppress evidence of eyewitness identification; overly suggestive; police standing with suspect; reliability of identification; Due Process.