Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  Defendant May Introduce Evidence of Third Party's Guilt
Defendant May Introduce Evidence of Third Party's Guilt
Defendant May Introduce Evidence of Third Party's Guilt Cartoons

Defendant May Introduce Evidence of Third Party's Guilt

Holmes v. South Carolina; Rules of evidence in criminal trials may not be arbitrary, must be focused on the central issues in the case, and must be applied to afford the defendant a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Mattox v. United States
Mattox v. United States
Defendant rights under confrontation clause are satisfied if defendant has once had opportunity to see a witness face to face and subject that witness to cross examination. Confrontation clause.
United States v. Crumby
United States v. Crumby
Polygraph evidence will be admitted for limited purpose of impeaching or corroborating credibility of defendant who testifies.
Trammel v. United States
Trammel v. United States
Witness may be neither compelled to testify nor barred from testifying against his or her spouse. Privilege for marital communications; marital privilege.
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings
There is no testimonial privilege for parent child communications. Motion to quash.
Character Evidence
Character Evidence
United States v. Whitmore; Rule 608(a); party may introduce reputation or opinion evidence of a witness's character for truthfulness only if character witness is acquainted with witness, his community, and circles in which he has moved.
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause
Crawford v. Washington; for out-of-court statement to be admitted into evidence, the witness must be unavailable and the defendant must have had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.
Judicial Notice Of Geographic Facts
Judicial Notice Of Geographic Facts
De La Cruz v. City of Los Angeles; An appellate court has the authority to take judicial notice of the distances between places, and a map is a proper subject of judicial notice; respondeat superior.
Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders
Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders
U.S. v. Amado-Nunez; The whole range of human experience, from the rough meaning of common terms to human psychology, and which may properly enter into the fact-finder's decision-making process without the need for direct evidence.
Marital Privilege
Marital Privilege
United States v. Montgomery; the marital communications privilege applies to all private communications between spouses in a valid marriage unless evidence shows they were not intended to be confidential.
Authentication and Foundation
Authentication and Foundation
Turnage v. State; A duplicate document or recording is admissible to the same extent as the original unless a genuine question is raised about the authenticity of the duplicate or it would be unfair to admit.
Unavailable Witness
Unavailable Witness
United States v. Duenas; similar motive to cross-examine required; former testimony inadmissible; deceased declarant; hearsay rule.
Improper Testimony
Improper Testimony
United States v. Moore; admission of improper testimony does not always result in reversal of conviction; inadmissible evidence; appeal; corroborating evidence.