Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice Cartoons

Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice

Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States; One knowingly corruptly persuades another person with intent to cause that person to withhold documents from, or alter documents for use in, an official proceeding only when conscious of wrongdoing.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

State v. Christy Pontiac-GMC, Inc.
State v. Christy Pontiac-GMC, Inc.
Corporation may be convicted of specific-intent crime when agent of corporation takes illegal acts in furtherance of the corporate business interests; alter ego; commercial crime; corporate crime; legal fiction; specific intent; swindle.
The Sentencing Reform Act
The Sentencing Reform Act
United States v. Gementera, judge force convict to declare crime in public, The Sentencing Reform Act affords courts broad discretion in fashioning conditions of supervised release reasonably related to nature and circumstances of offense.
Fair Warning In Legislation
Fair Warning In Legislation
McBoyle v. United States, legislation must be drafted in such a way as to give citizens fair warning of what conduct is encompassed within the statute, ejusdem generis.
Hines v. State
Hines v. State
Felonies that create a foreseeable risk of death under the circumstances are inherently dangerous, justifying the felony-murder rule.
Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia
The execution of a mentally retarded person is "cruel and unusual punishment" and therefore violates the Eighth Amendment.
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
People v. Smith; second-degree felony murder conviction cannot stand when in it is based on a felony that is an integral part of the homicide and the evidence produced by the prosecution shows it to be an offense included in fact within homicide.
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Perez v. Cain; In a federal habeas proceeding, the standard is whether, after viewing evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Perjury By Implication Not Allowed
Perjury By Implication Not Allowed
Bronston v. United States; To support a perjury conviction, a witness must actually willfully state a material matter that he does not believe to be true.
Exculpatory-No Doctrine
Exculpatory-No Doctrine
Brogan v. United States; A "false statement" under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 includes any false statement knowingly and willfully made within the jurisdiction of a federal agency, encompassing even a mere false denial of criminal wrongdoing.
Failure to Alleviate Risk
Failure to Alleviate Risk
Commonwealth v. Levesque; criminal liability is possible for failure to alleviate risk that the defendant created.
Continuous Conspiracy
Continuous Conspiracy
Pinkerton v. United States; When there is a continuous conspiracy, and no evidence of affirmative action to establish withdrawal, as long as the partnership in crime continues, the partners act for each other.
Honest Services Fraud Doctrine
Honest Services Fraud Doctrine
Skilling v. United States; bribery and kickbacks are honest services fraud, but conflict of interest is not.