Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Property  >  Domain Names are Intangible Property
Domain Names are Intangible Property
Domain Names are Intangible Property Cartoons

Domain Names are Intangible Property

Kremen v. Cohen & Network Solutions, Inc.; a domain name registrar may be liable for conversion of a registered name; bailee; bailment; third-party beneficiary; trespass to chattels.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Kelo v. New London
Kelo v. New London
Fifth amendment, eminent domain just compensation, public purpose, takings of private property, private economic development.
Penn Central Transportation Company v. City of New York
Penn Central Transportation Company v. City of New York
Eminent domain clause; takings clause, landmark, payment of just compensation.
Goodridge v. Department of Public Health
Goodridge v. Department of Public Health
Same-sex partners are entitled to the benefits, liabilities, and obligations of civil marriage; gay rights; due process; equal protection; Massachusetts constitution.
Kutzin v. Pirnie
Kutzin v. Pirnie
Party in breach is entitled to restitution of any contractual deposit for benefit conferred by part performance or reliance in excess of loss caused by breach. Forfeiture clause, liquidated damages, penalty clause, restitution, specific performance.
Shareholder Tenant Challenge to Residential Cooperative Corporation
Shareholder Tenant Challenge to Residential Cooperative Corporation
40 West 67th Street Corp. v. Pullman; Levandusky established standard of review analogous to corporate business judgment rule for shareholder-tenant challenge to decision of residential cooperative corporation; declaratory judgment; ejectment.
Lender Unfair Trade Practice
Lender Unfair Trade Practice
Commonwealth v. Fremont Investment & Loan; lender commits an unfair trade practice when it makes adjustable rate home mortgage loans and reasonably knows borrower will default if not refinanced after introductory interest rate period expires.
Federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000
Federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000
Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of Sutter; Local land use regulations require individualized assessments of proposed uses of property that impose substantial burdens on religious exercise.
Takings Clause
Takings Clause
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep't of Environmental Protection; The Takings Clause protects property rights as they are established under state law, which is none here due to doctrine of avulsion. Takings analysis.
Patent Act
Patent Act
Diamond v. Chakrabarty; The language employed in the Patent Act is given broad application, such that a micro-organism that is the product of human ingenuity, as opposed to nature, is patentable. Property Law.
Takings Analysis
Takings Analysis
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District; Fifth Amendment right to just compensation for property the government takes when owners apply for land-use permits; land use permit applicants are especially vulnerable. Property Law.
Public Trust Doctrine
Public Trust Doctrine
Matthews v. Bay Head Improvement Association; The public's ability to exercise its rights under the public trust doctrine includes the right to pass across the upland beach. Property Law.
Constructive Eviction
Constructive Eviction
Village Commons, LLC v. Marion County Prosecutor's Office; tenant is relieved of obligation to pay rent if landlord deprives tenant of possession and beneficial use and enjoyment of any part of demised premises by eviction. Property Law.