Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  Dying Declaration Exception to Hearsay Rule
Dying Declaration Exception to Hearsay Rule
Dying Declaration Exception to Hearsay Rule Cartoons

Dying Declaration Exception to Hearsay Rule

State v. Jensen; To be a dying declaration, statement must have been made by the declarant while believing death was imminent, and must concern the cause or circumstances of what the declarant believed to be the declarant's impending death.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

United States v. Figueroa-Lopez
United States v. Figueroa-Lopez
Witness may not give opinion testimony about matters outside the realm of common knowledge unless that witness is qualified as an expert. Expert witness.
United States v. Hines
United States v. Hines
Expert testimony may be introduced on matters ordinarily within understanding of jury if the inferences jury may draw on subject could be erroneous.
In Re Osterhoudt
In Re Osterhoudt
Attorney client privilege. Identity of attorney's client and nature of any fee agreement are not protected by attorney client privilege, unless disclosure of information would implicate client in criminal activity for which legal advice was sought.
Specialized Knowledge is Basis for Expert Testimony
Specialized Knowledge is Basis for Expert Testimony
United States v. Ganier; computer software experience provides expert, not lay, testimony.
Journalists Must Reveal Sources To Grand Juries
Journalists Must Reveal Sources To Grand Juries
In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller; no First Amendment privilege that protects journalists from providing evidence to a grand jury.
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd; The residual hearsay exceptions should be used very rarely, and only in exceptional and unanticipated circumstances that are not specifically covered by particular exceptions.
Forfeiture By Wrongdoing
Forfeiture By Wrongdoing
Giles v. California; Forfeiture by wrongdoing applies only when defendant engaged or acquiesced in wrongdoing that was intended to, and did, procure unavailability of declarant as witness; domestic volence.
Admissability of Taped Conversations
Admissability of Taped Conversations
United States v. Oslund; taped conversations are admissible if the surrounding circumstances as a whole demonstrate reliability.
Crime Lab Testimony
Crime Lab Testimony
Bullcoming v. New Mexico; Confrontation Clause; surrogate testimony; right to confront the lab analyst who certified a forensic laboratory report; right to cross-examination; DUI; DWI; blood alcohol level.
Clergy Privilege
Clergy Privilege
In re Grand Jury Investigation; confessional; confessor; clergy communicant privilege; confidential relationship; priest; minister; clergyman.
Emergency Statements
Emergency Statements
People v. Sergio; Tarasoff exception; statement to the EMT ambulance drivers were not doctor patient privilege; physician patient privilege.
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Williams v. Illinois; Confrontation Clause; admission of DNA evidence; laboratory report; forensics report; DNA match; sexual assualt medical evidence.