Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Ewing v. California
Ewing v. California
Ewing v. California Cartoons

Ewing v. California

Three strikes law, Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, deterrence, proportionality, recidivism, rehabilitation.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Commonwealth v. Mitchneck
Commonwealth v. Mitchneck
Failing to pay money to a creditor under an agreement to pay the debt of another does not constitute fraudulent conversion, since the money at issue never belonged to the creditor; conversion novation.
Fair Warning In Legislation
Fair Warning In Legislation
McBoyle v. United States, legislation must be drafted in such a way as to give citizens fair warning of what conduct is encompassed within the statute, ejusdem generis.
M.C. v. Bulgaria
M.C. v. Bulgaria
Essential element of the crime of rape is lack of consent.
United States v. McDermott
United States v. McDermott
A conspiracy requires a unity of unlawful purpose between two or more individuals.
Clark v. Arizona
Clark v. Arizona
Mens rae, under Arizona's Mott rule, a court will not allow evidence of a mental disorder short of insanity as bearing on a defendant's capacity to form specific intent.
Withdrawing From Consipiracy Requires Affirmative Act
Withdrawing From Consipiracy Requires Affirmative Act
State v. Formella; An individual is criminally liable for the conduct of another when he acts as an accomplice by promoting or facilitating, or by aiding, or agreeing or attempting to aid, another person in planning or committing the offense.
Felony Murder Rule
Felony Murder Rule
People v. Cavitt; The felony-murder rule requires both a causal relationship and a temporal relationship between the underlying felony and the act resulting in death.
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States; One knowingly corruptly persuades another person with intent to cause that person to withhold documents from, or alter documents for use in, an official proceeding only when conscious of wrongdoing.
Factors Determining If In Possession of Drugs
Factors Determining If In Possession of Drugs
Smith v. State; Several factors, no one of which is conclusive, determine if defendant was "in possession" of drugs: proximity, in plain view, indicia of mutual use and enjoyment, and ownership or possessory interest in location where discovered.
Viability Standard for Fetus
Viability Standard for Fetus
Keeler v. Superior Court; viability of the embryo was not the standard for human being in California in the 1970's.
Accomplice Liability
Accomplice Liability
Commonwealth v. Roebuck; An accomplice is accountable for contributing to criminal conduct to the degree his culpability equals what is required to support liability of a principal actor.
Sentencing Guideline Range
Sentencing Guideline Range
United States v. Bernard Madoff; While the court must give the sentencing guideline range fair and respectful consideration, it is not bound by it and must make an individualized sentencing assessment.