Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide Cartoons

Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide

People v. Smith; second-degree felony murder conviction cannot stand when in it is based on a felony that is an integral part of the homicide and the evidence produced by the prosecution shows it to be an offense included in fact within homicide.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

McCleskey v. Kemp
McCleskey v. Kemp
Repeat.
People v. Unger
People v. Unger
Necessity defense; compulsion; duress; eighth amendment; justification; justification defense. Prisoner may escape to avoid harm if did not cause situation and reasonably believed actions necessary to avoid greater injury than escape.
Commonwealth v. Fischer
Commonwealth v. Fischer
Reasonable mistake of fact regarding a victim's consent is not a defense to a rape charge. Mens rea.
Three Strikes
Three Strikes
James v. United States; Attempted burglary, as defined by Florida law, is a violent felony under ACCA Armed Career Criminal Act; three strikes.
Latimer v. The Queen
Latimer v. The Queen
Mercy killing is murder; for defense of necessity to apply, there must be an urgent situation of clear and imminent peril, no reasonable legal alternative to disobeying the law, and proportionality between the harm inflicted and the harm avoided.
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
In Re Winship, In juvenile court, guilt of criminal charges must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Rule of Lenity
The Rule of Lenity
United States v. Dauray, The rule of lenity requires that ambiguities in a criminal statute be resolved in the defendant's favor, noscitur a socis.
Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller
Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller
Selective prosecution, courts are reluctant to interfere with prosecutorial discretion.
Williams v. New York
Williams v. New York
Pre-sentence investigation, imposition of death sentence for murder in the first degree is not void under the Due Process Clause solely because trial court, before imposing sentence, considered additional information from probation department.
Factors Determining If In Possession of Drugs
Factors Determining If In Possession of Drugs
Smith v. State; Several factors, no one of which is conclusive, determine if defendant was "in possession" of drugs: proximity, in plain view, indicia of mutual use and enjoyment, and ownership or possessory interest in location where discovered.
Honest Services Fraud Doctrine
Honest Services Fraud Doctrine
Skilling v. United States; bribery and kickbacks are honest services fraud, but conflict of interest is not.
Probation for Corporate Defendants
Probation for Corporate Defendants
United States v. Guidant; A term of probation is appropriate for corporate defendants to hold them accountable and serve the public interests.