Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Torts  >  Foreseeability Is A Fact Question
Foreseeability Is A Fact Question
Foreseeability Is A Fact Question Cartoons

Foreseeability Is A Fact Question

A.W. v. Lancaster County School District 0001. Questions of foreseeability in the context of determining whether an alleged tortfeasor's duty to take reasonable care has been breached must be decided by the finder of fact. Avoid Jury Trial.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

economic loss rule
economic loss rule
532 Madison Avenue Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Center, Inc.; adjoining landowners; purely economic losses; construction defects.
Proximate Cause
Proximate Cause
Doe v. Manheimer; a negligent act is the legal cause of a plaintiff's injury only if the injury would not have occurred without the act, and if the negligent act was a substantial factor in producing the plaintiff's injury.
Damage Limits in Maritime Cases
Damage Limits in Maritime Cases
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker; In maritime cases, compensatory and punitive damages should be limited to a 1:1 ratio.; malice; remittur.
Immunity Statutes and Damages Limits Cannot Deny Meaningful Remedy
Immunity Statutes and Damages Limits Cannot Deny Meaningful Remedy
Clarke v. Oregon Health Sciences University; The Remedy Clause of the Oregon Constitution provides that, although the legislature may change a remedy or procedure, it cannot deny a remedy entirely.
Sovereign Immunity under FTCA
Sovereign Immunity under FTCA
United States v. Olson; FTCA requires a court to look to state law on the liability of private entities, not public entities, when assessing the government's liability in activities that private persons do not perform; discretionary function.
Discretionary Function Exception to Government Liability
Discretionary Function Exception to Government Liability
Whisnant v. United States; Because removing an obvious health hazard is a matter of safety rather than policy, the government's alleged failure to do so is not protected under discretionary function exception.
Liability for Hiring An Incompetent Contractor
Liability for Hiring An Incompetent Contractor
Puckrein v. ATI Transport, Inc; to prevail against principal for hiring incompetent contractor plaintiff must show contractor was incompetent, unskilled perform job for which hired, the harm arose due to incompetence and principal knew incompetent.
Workers' Compensation Injury Requirements
Workers' Compensation Injury Requirements
Wait v. Traveler's Indemnity Co. of Illinois; to recover under Tennessee Workers' Compensation Act, injury must both arise out of and occur in the course of an employee's employment.
Workers' Compensation Specific Intent
Workers' Compensation Specific Intent
Rainer v. Union Carbide Corp. An employer acts with deliberate intention, so the employee's injury is excepted from workers' compensation exclusivity, only when it determines to injure an employee and uses some means appropriate to that end.
Learned Intermediary Doctrine
Learned Intermediary Doctrine
State v. Karl. Manufacturers of prescription drugs are subject to the same duty to warn consumers about the risks of their products as other manufacturers.
Slip and Fall Damages
Slip and Fall Damages
Averyt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; Where the jury's damages award is supported by the evidence, a reviewing court will not reverse it.
Parental Immunity Doctrine
Parental Immunity Doctrine
Neel v. Sewell; claims of negligent supervision are properly viewed as involving the exercise of reasonable parental authority over a child, and are thus barred by parental immunity.