Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Cartoons

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree

When a vehicle is stopped at a traffic stop, the passenger as well as the driver is seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment for search and seizure.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Gray v. Maryland
Gray v. Maryland
The use of blanks or deleted references in a redacted confession of a co-defendant may not be offered against a defendant at a joint trial, even with a limiting instruction. Redaction.
Fong Foo v. United States
Fong Foo v. United States
A judgment of acquittal, even if based on error, is a final judgment that cannot be appealed. Writ of mandamus; double jeopardy.
Harris v. Oklahoma
Harris v. Oklahoma
When the conviction of a greater crime cannot be had without conviction of a lesser crime, the double jeopardy clause bars prosecution for the lesser crime after conviction for the greater crime.
Police Searches Of Network Computers Require Warrant
Police Searches Of Network Computers Require Warrant
United States v. Heckenkamp; absent clear warnings, connecting a personal computer to a computer network does not relinquish an otherwise objectively reasonable expectation of privacy; warrantless search.
Probable Cause
Probable Cause
Brendlin v. California; fruit of the poisonous tree; officers did not have probable cause to stop vehicle, passenger was seized and evidence discovered as result was inadmissible.
Reasonable Cause
Reasonable Cause
United States v. Knights; consent to future searches is a permitted condition of probation.
Compulsion of Testimony
Compulsion of Testimony
McKune v. Lile; limiting inmate privileges is not compution of testimony. Fifth Amendment. Right to remain silent. Miranda.
Jurisdictional Defect
Jurisdictional Defect
United States v. Cotton; failure to state the amount of drugs in an indictment is not a jurisdictional defect.
Double Jeopardy Clause
Double Jeopardy Clause
Renico v. Lett; trail judge is entitled to deference in declaring a mistrial due to jury deadlock.
Federal Habeas Standard
Federal Habeas Standard
Harrington v. Richter; when the state court's decision is unaccompanied by explanation, the petitioner's burden must be met by showing there was no reasonable basis for the state court to deny relief.
Selective Prosecution
Selective Prosecution
United States v. Armstrong; claim of selective prosecution based on race; claimant must produce evidence that similarly situated offenders of a different race could have been prosecuted but were not.
Miranda Warnings
Miranda Warnings
Florida v. Powell; Although the four warnings Miranda requires are invariable, there are no specific words that must be used to adequately convey them.

Browse Similar Items