Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Contracts  >  Gift is Not Consideration
Gift is Not Consideration
Gift is Not Consideration Cartoons

Gift is Not Consideration

Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. American Ash Recycling Corp.; The bargain theory of consideration does not actually require that the parties bargain over the terms of the agreement; rather, a promise and a reciprocal conventional inducement.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Security Interest
Security Interest
Helms v. Certified Packaging Corp.; security interest includes the proceeds from a recovery for decreased value of collateral, and not for loss of use of the collateral; destroyed property; damaged property.
Stated Income Loan
Stated Income Loan
In re Dixon Ford; stated income mortgage; holder in due course; mortgage application fraud; loan application altered income stated.
Fraudulent Conveyance
Fraudulent Conveyance
James H. Rice Co. v. McJohn; A fraudulent transfer of propoerty to avoid debt will be set aside; fraudulent conveyance of asset is null and void; levy.
Breach of Warranty
Breach of Warranty
Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.; Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act; breach of warranty claim; statute of limitations; repair claims do not accrue upon delivery of the product.
Repudiation
Repudiation
Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. U.S.; if a party repudiates a contract, the other party is entitled to restitution for any benefit he has conferred on the repudiating party by way of part performance or reliance.
Agreement to Arbitrate
Agreement to Arbitrate
Rent-A-Center v. Jackson; The Federal Arbitration Act puts arbitration agreements on equal footing with other contracts, and requires courts to enforce them according to their terms; unconscionability challenges.
Right to Walk Away
Right to Walk Away
United Rentals, Inc. v. RAM Holdings, Inc.; When the examination of extrinsic evidence does not lead to an obvious, objectively reasonable conclusion, the court may apply the forthright negotiator principle.
Doctrine of Impossibility
Doctrine of Impossibility
YPI 180 N. LaSalle Owner, LLC v. 180 N. LaSalle II, LLC; the doctrine of impossibility of performance excuses performance if objectively impossible due to destruction of the subject matter of the contract or by operation of law.
Stale Debt
Stale Debt
First Hawaiian Bank v. Jack Zukerhorn; A new promise by the debtor to pay his debt, whether or not then barred by the applicable statute of limitations, binds the debtor for a new limitations period.
Multiple Writings
Multiple Writings
Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.; Statute of Frauds does not require single writing; multiple writings ok if linked by a reference within them to the same subject matter or transaction. Signed and unsigned writings may be read together.
Induce Detrimental Reliance
Induce Detrimental Reliance
Drennan v. Star Paving Co.; A promise the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance of a definite and substantial character and that does is binding if neccessary to avoid injustice.
Prevention Doctrine Rule
Prevention Doctrine Rule
Johnson v. Coss; the prevention doctrine operates as an exception to the general rule than one has no duty to perform under a contract containing a condition precedent until the condition occurs.