Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  In the Interest of M.T.S.
In the Interest of M.T.S.
In the Interest of M.T.S. Cartoons

In the Interest of M.T.S.

Sexual assault consists of any act of sexual penetration done without the affirmative and freely given permission of the victim. Juvenile delinquency.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens
The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens
Necessity does not justify killing another person who poses no danger. Assize.
People v. Unger
People v. Unger
Necessity defense; compulsion; duress; eighth amendment; justification; justification defense. Prisoner may escape to avoid harm if did not cause situation and reasonably believed actions necessary to avoid greater injury than escape.
State v. Ochoa
State v. Ochoa
Person is an aider and abettor if he shares the criminal intent of the principal and acts in concert with the principal; Abet; accesory; aid and abet; incite; riot.
United States v. Diaz
United States v. Diaz
Participant in a conspiracy is criminally liable for all acts that are done by other members in furtherance of the conspiracy and that are reasonably foreseeable as a necessary consequence of the unlawful agreement.
People v. Robertson
People v. Robertson
Felony murder instruction not proper when underlying felony is integral part of the homicide; shooting to scare off burglars can result in a murder conviction.
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
In Re Winship, In juvenile court, guilt of criminal charges must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Rule of Lenity
The Rule of Lenity
United States v. Dauray, The rule of lenity requires that ambiguities in a criminal statute be resolved in the defendant's favor, noscitur a socis.
People v. Hall
People v. Hall
Ski accident, Whether a risk of death is substantial and unjustifiable must be determined based on the circumstances of each case.
Clark v. Arizona
Clark v. Arizona
Mens rae, under Arizona's Mott rule, a court will not allow evidence of a mental disorder short of insanity as bearing on a defendant's capacity to form specific intent.
Uses or Carries Firearm in Drug Trafficing Crime
Uses or Carries Firearm in Drug Trafficing Crime
Muscarello v. United States; The word "carry," in ordinary sense includes carrying in car neither basic purpose nor legislative history 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) supports circumscribing scope word "carry" by applying "on the person" limitation; lenity.
Mayberry Instruction Must Have Evidence of Mistaken Belief
Mayberry Instruction Must Have Evidence of Mistaken Belief
People v. Williams; trial court must give instruction on mistaken belief to consent to intercourse in rape case only when the defense is supported by substantial evidence sufficient to deserve consideration by jury.
Death Penalty for Child Rape
Death Penalty for Child Rape
Kennedy v. Louisiana; court says child rape not heinous enough for the death penalty; disproportionate.