Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Employment  >  Job Applicants May Not Recover If Not Harmed
Job Applicants May Not Recover If Not Harmed
Job Applicants May Not Recover If Not Harmed Cartoons

Job Applicants May Not Recover If Not Harmed

Starbucks Corp. v. Superior Court; A disclaimer in a standard job application advising an applicant that he or she need not complete certain sections as provided by local law must be clear and conspicuous .
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Administaff v. New York Joint Board
Administaff v. New York Joint Board
Joint employers, WARN Act violations, ordered a closing or layoff.
Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District
Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District
Gender-stereotyping, establish discrimination on basis of sex.
Garcetti v. Ceballos
Garcetti v. Ceballos
Citizen speech, public-employee speech, First Amendment, freedom of speech.
Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.
Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.
Terminate, discharge employee, violating company policy, imminent danger.
Hansen v. America Online, Inc.
Hansen v. America Online, Inc.
Employers ban guns from premises, infringing employees constitutional rights, right to bear arms.
Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc.
Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc.
Gender-specific employment policies, discrimination.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
Employers non-discriminatory justifications for actions, Title VII case, unlawful discrimination, pretext.
Reed v. The Great Lakes Companies, Inc.
Reed v. The Great Lakes Companies, Inc.
Title VII forbids intentional discrimination on the basis of ones religion, affirmative duty, reasonably accommodate any bona fide religious beliefs.
Smith v. City of Jackson
Smith v. City of Jackson
Disparate-impact, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, disparate treatment, age discrimination case.
Retaliation Claim Basis Opposition
Retaliation Claim Basis Opposition
Crawford v. Metropolitan Government Nashville; Under Title VII, an employee may "oppose" unlawful employment practice as required as a condition precedent to a retaliation claim even though opposition is not expressed as a discrimination claim.
Duties of Care and Loyalty
Duties of Care and Loyalty
Sandvick v. LaCrosse; a partners and joint venturers both owe a duty of care and loyalty to each other.
Assumption of LLC Liability
Assumption of LLC Liability
Racing Investment Fund 2000, LLC v. Clay Ward Agency, Inc.; assumption of personal liability by a member of an LLC is so antithetical to the purpose of a limited liability company that it must be stated in unequivocal terms.