Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Civil Procedure  >  Jurors Can Reconcile Inconsistent Verdicts
Jurors Can Reconcile Inconsistent Verdicts
Jurors Can Reconcile Inconsistent Verdicts Cartoons

Jurors Can Reconcile Inconsistent Verdicts

Duk v. MGM Grand Hotel, Inc; Where the jury is still available, a district court's decision to resubmit an inconsistent verdict for clarification is within its discretion; comparative negligence; contributory negligence.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

In Re Auction Houses Antitrust Litigation
In Re Auction Houses Antitrust Litigation
A contract may form the basis of a discovery obligation under the federal rules of civil procedure, interrogatory.
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC
Expense and burden of certain discovery requests may be shifted to the requesting party, discoverable matter includes both paper and electronic documents.
Semtek International, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Semtek International, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Time-barred, longer statutory period, claim-preclusive effect of a judgment on the merits in a federal diversity action, claim preclusion, res judicata, statute of limitations.
General Jurisdiction
General Jurisdiction
Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.; exercise general jursidiction gives court authority to hear all claims at place of defendant's domicile or place of service, without showing connection between specific claims and forum state.
Short and Plain Statement of Even A Fraud Claim
Short and Plain Statement of Even A Fraud Claim
Denny v. Carey; Rule 9(b)'s requirement of pleading fraud with particularity must be harmonized with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8's requirement of short and plain statement of the plaintiff's claim that is simple, concise, and direct; on information and belief.
Voluntary Participation Before Magistrate Constitutes Consent
Voluntary Participation Before Magistrate Constitutes Consent
Roell v. Withrow; When a party has signaled consent to the magistrate judge's authority to hear a case through actions rather than words, there is little value in strict insistence on an express consent requirement.
Rule Against Nonparty Preclusion Exceptions
Rule Against Nonparty Preclusion Exceptions
Taylor v. Sturgell; The rule against nonparty preclusion is subject only to certain recognized exceptions: (1) a nonparty may agree to be bound by a judgment, (2) certain substantive relationships..; virtual representation; virtual representation doctrine.
Nicotine Addicts Not Entitled To Class Treatment
Nicotine Addicts Not Entitled To Class Treatment
Castano v. American Tobacco; A district court must conduct a rigorous analysis of the Rule 23 prerequisites before certifying a class; sui generis.
Partial Judgments Are Not Final For Purposes Of Appeal
Partial Judgments Are Not Final For Purposes Of Appeal
Nystrom v. TREX, Inc; Interlocutory appeals are within court's discretion, and will be granted only when court certifies that each ruling presented for appeal involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial difference of opinion.
State Class Action Lawsuits
State Class Action Lawsuits
Preston v. Tenet Healthsystem Memorial Medical Center, Inc; The Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) creates a narrow exception to federal jurisdiction and allows the discretionary remand of purely local actions.
Duty to Warn
Duty to Warn
C.A. Hardy, et al. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, et al.; not all asbestos manufacturers are liable in every asbestos related personal injury suit.
Contention Interrogatories
Contention Interrogatories
Cable & Computer Technology, Inc. v. Lockheed Saunders, Inc.; Rule 33 states that an interrogatory is not objectionable because it asks for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact.