Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt Cartoons

Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt

In Re Winship, In juvenile court, guilt of criminal charges must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

People v. Unger
People v. Unger
Necessity defense; compulsion; duress; eighth amendment; justification; justification defense. Prisoner may escape to avoid harm if did not cause situation and reasonably believed actions necessary to avoid greater injury than escape.
United States v. Hilton Hotel Corp.
United States v. Hilton Hotel Corp.
Corporation cannot disown the criminal acts of its agents simply by making it company policy not to break the law; to do so would permit a corporate defendant to avoid responsibility for illegal conduct it actually condoned. Sherman antitrust act.
In the Interest of M.T.S.
In the Interest of M.T.S.
Sexual assault consists of any act of sexual penetration done without the affirmative and freely given permission of the victim. Juvenile delinquency.
M.C. v. Bulgaria
M.C. v. Bulgaria
Essential element of the crime of rape is lack of consent.
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
People v. Smith; second-degree felony murder conviction cannot stand when in it is based on a felony that is an integral part of the homicide and the evidence produced by the prosecution shows it to be an offense included in fact within homicide.
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Perez v. Cain; In a federal habeas proceeding, the standard is whether, after viewing evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Honest Services Fraud
Honest Services Fraud
United States v. Rybicki; To establish honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1346, the evidence must show (1) a scheme or artifice to defraud; (2) for depriving another ofhonest services...; bribery; conflict of interest; kickback; self-dealing behavior.
Exculpatory-No Doctrine
Exculpatory-No Doctrine
Brogan v. United States; A "false statement" under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 includes any false statement knowingly and willfully made within the jurisdiction of a federal agency, encompassing even a mere false denial of criminal wrongdoing.
Good Faith Mistake of Fact
Good Faith Mistake of Fact
Commonwealth v. Sherry; wheter a reasonable good-faith mistake of fact as to consent is a defense to the crime of rape;
Unjustified Risk Taking
Unjustified Risk Taking
People v. Moore; defendant's driving created a sufficiently high probability of death for a second-degree murder conviction; the defendant was subjectively aware of the risk from prior DWI (driving while intoxicated).
Probation for Corporate Defendants
Probation for Corporate Defendants
United States v. Guidant; A term of probation is appropriate for corporate defendants to hold them accountable and serve the public interests.
Sentencing Guideline Range
Sentencing Guideline Range
United States v. Bernard Madoff; While the court must give the sentencing guideline range fair and respectful consideration, it is not bound by it and must make an individualized sentencing assessment.