Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Employment  >  Lester v. Department of Employment Security
Lester v. Department of Employment Security
Lester v. Department of Employment Security Cartoons

Lester v. Department of Employment Security

Job offers accepted, refusal must be reasonable.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corporation
Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corporation
Mandatory arbitration policy, judicial forum, alternative dispute resolution, arbitration clause.
Cleary v. American Airlines
Cleary v. American Airlines
Employers follow company procedures before discharging employees, wrongful discharge, implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
Garcetti v. Ceballos
Garcetti v. Ceballos
Citizen speech, public-employee speech, First Amendment, freedom of speech.
Greenawalt v. Indiana Department of Corrections
Greenawalt v. Indiana Department of Corrections
Employer-administered psychological examinations, unconstitutional searches, The Fourth Amendment, highly personal private information, state action.
Petty v. University of Delaware
Petty v. University of Delaware
Available for work, qualified, willing, able, and ready to accept employment, no good cause to refuse.
Preston v. Wisconsin Health Fund
Preston v. Wisconsin Health Fund
Sex discrimination, affirmative action.
Sauerland v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
Sauerland v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
A single act of misconduct involving dishonesty or a critical offense may disqualify a discharged employee from receiving unemployment benefits.
Smith v. City of Jackson
Smith v. City of Jackson
Disparate-impact, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, disparate treatment, age discrimination case.
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
Qualify as disabled under the ADA, physical impairment, mental impairment, substantially limits a major life activity, Americans with Disabilities Act.
Job Applicants May Not Recover If Not Harmed
Job Applicants May Not Recover If Not Harmed
Starbucks Corp. v. Superior Court; A disclaimer in a standard job application advising an applicant that he or she need not complete certain sections as provided by local law must be clear and conspicuous .
Cat's Paw Theory
Cat's Paw Theory
Staub v. Proctor Hospital; Under the cat's paw theory, discriminatory animus of non-decisionmakers can be imputed to decisionmakers only when the non-decisionmaker has a singular influence over the decisionmaker and uses that influence.
Duties of Care and Loyalty
Duties of Care and Loyalty
Sandvick v. LaCrosse; a partners and joint venturers both owe a duty of care and loyalty to each other.