Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  Lilly v. Virginia
Lilly v. Virginia
Lilly v. Virginia Cartoons

Lilly v. Virginia

A hearsay exception is regarded as firmly rooted if, in light of longstanding legislative and judicial experience, the admission of virtually any evidence under that exception comports with substance of Confrontation Clause.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

United States v. Johnson
United States v. Johnson
Witness may qualify as expert if witness expertise is derived entirely from experience in a particular area. Expert witness qualifications.
Blackmon v. State
Blackmon v. State
Attorney client privilege. In order for statement to attorney to be confidential, client must reasonably intend that communication be confidential.
United States v. Zolin
United States v. Zolin
Court should undertake in camera review of evidence to determine if crime fraud exception will bar claim of attorney client privilege only if there is factual showing adequate to support good faith belief that review may reveal evidence of fraud.
United States v. Hubbell
United States v. Hubbell
Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination protects witness from being compelled to answer questions about existence of sources of potentially incriminating evidence and from subpoena seeking discovery. Transactional immunity.
Trammel v. United States
Trammel v. United States
Witness may be neither compelled to testify nor barred from testifying against his or her spouse. Privilege for marital communications; marital privilege.
Attorney Client Privilege Applies to Government Attorneys
Attorney Client Privilege Applies to Government Attorneys
In Re: Grand Jury Investigation Rowland; confidentiality applies to public attorneys same as with private lawyers.
Dying Declaration Exception to Hearsay Rule
Dying Declaration Exception to Hearsay Rule
State v. Jensen; To be a dying declaration, statement must have been made by the declarant while believing death was imminent, and must concern the cause or circumstances of what the declarant believed to be the declarant's impending death.
Admitting Photocopies Usually Allowed
Admitting Photocopies Usually Allowed
United States v. Hampton; Under Federal Rule of Evidence 1003, a duplicate is admissible to the same extent as the original unless there is a genuine question as to the authenticity of the original.
Judicial Notice Of Geographic Facts
Judicial Notice Of Geographic Facts
De La Cruz v. City of Los Angeles; An appellate court has the authority to take judicial notice of the distances between places, and a map is a proper subject of judicial notice; respondeat superior.
Confrontation Clause
Confrontation Clause
People v. Moreno; defendant forfeits his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation if he wrongfully keeps a witness from testifying at trial, but it must be proven defendant's actions were intended to make witness unavailable; confrontation clause.
Lie Detector Test
Lie Detector Test
United States v. Semrau; admissibility of lie detector test; expert testimony; reliability of scientific evidence; Daubert hearing.
Emergency Statements
Emergency Statements
People v. Sergio; Tarasoff exception; statement to the EMT ambulance drivers were not doctor patient privilege; physician patient privilege.