Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Constitutional Law  >  Litigation as Political Expression
Litigation as Political Expression
Litigation as Political Expression Cartoons

Litigation as Political Expression

NAACP v. Button; When litigation is used as a form of political expression the government may limit it only if there is a compelling state interest.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Least Restrictive Means Test
Least Restrictive Means Test
Dean Milk co. v. Madison. A health and safety ordinance that discriminates against interstate commerce will be invalid if reasonable and adequate non-discriminatory alternatives are available.
Market Participant Doctrine
Market Participant Doctrine
South Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wuunicke. Although state owned businesses may favor resident purchasers, they may not attach conditions to the sale of products that will burden interstate commerce.
Line Item Veto Act
Line Item Veto Act
Clinton v. City of New York; Use of Line Item Veto Act to cancel spending for a budget item violates the Constitution by permitting the virtual amendment of Congressional acts by the President.; delegation doctrine.
Slaughter-House Cases
Slaughter-House Cases
Slaughter-House Cases; The 13th Amendment and 14th Amendment are to be read narrowly to apply only to former slaves and African-Americans. Procedural guarantees are not yet applicable to the states.
Speech Criticizing A Law Doesn't Break It
Speech Criticizing A Law Doesn't Break It
Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten; Speech criticizing a law may not be punished as encouraging the violation of the law unless the full meaning of the expression directly counsels or advises others to violate the last as it stands.
Clear And Present Danger Test Case
Clear And Present Danger Test Case
Whitney v. California; A state may pursuant to police powers punish utterances or joining a group inimical to the public welfare as inciting crime, disturbing the public peace, or threatening the unlawful overthrow of organized governments.
The First Amendment
The First Amendment
American Booksellers Association v. Hudnut; The First Amendment's interest in promoting free speech outweighs the possibility that an injury may occur as a result of the speech. State may not declare one perspective right and silence opponents.
Commercial Speech
Commercial Speech
Central Hudson Gas v. Public Service Commission; Restrictions on commercial speech must serve a substantial government interest, restrict speech in the most limited way possible, and must not restrict speech unrelated to the government interest.
Prior Restraints On The Press
Prior Restraints On The Press
Near v. Minnesota; One of the chief purposes of the constitutional guarantee of freedom of the press is the prevention of impositions of prior restraints on the press.
Public School Accomodation of Religion
Public School Accomodation of Religion
Zorach v. Clauson; When a public school accommodates religious practice, without supporting or promoting it in any way, such accomodation does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Detain Aliens
Detain Aliens
Demore v. Kim; aliens may be detained pending removal deportation.
New York Times Standard
New York Times Standard
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.; defamation; libel; freedom of speech; freedom of press; public figure; public official; public interest; private individual; defamatory falsehood; First Amendment; Free Speech.