Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Mayberry Instruction Must Have Evidence of Mistaken Belief
Mayberry Instruction Must Have Evidence of Mistaken Belief
Mayberry Instruction Must Have Evidence of Mistaken Belief Cartoons

Mayberry Instruction Must Have Evidence of Mistaken Belief

People v. Williams; trial court must give instruction on mistaken belief to consent to intercourse in rape case only when the defense is supported by substantial evidence sufficient to deserve consideration by jury.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens
The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens
Necessity does not justify killing another person who poses no danger. Assize.
Attorney General for Jersey v. Holley
Attorney General for Jersey v. Holley
Provocation defense is akin to self defense; would a person having ordinary powers of self-control commit same crime as defendent given gravity of provocation? Evidence of the alcoholism or intoxication of defendant should not be considered.
People v. Howard
People v. Howard
Felony murder; accidental death during police chase is not felony muder; but murder can be committed without malice if the killing occurs during the commission of an inherently dangerous felony.
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
In Re Winship, In juvenile court, guilt of criminal charges must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Sentencing Reform Act
The Sentencing Reform Act
United States v. Gementera, judge force convict to declare crime in public, The Sentencing Reform Act affords courts broad discretion in fashioning conditions of supervised release reasonably related to nature and circumstances of offense.
Bordenkircher v. Hayes
Bordenkircher v. Hayes
It is not a vindictive exercise of a prosecutor's discretion, and therefore not a violation of due process, to reindict a defendant on more serious charges if the defendant does not plead guilty to the original offense charged.
Williams v. New York
Williams v. New York
Pre-sentence investigation, imposition of death sentence for murder in the first degree is not void under the Due Process Clause solely because trial court, before imposing sentence, considered additional information from probation department.
But-For-Cause of Injury
But-For-Cause of Injury
People v. Rideout; For a defendant's conduct to constitute the proximate cause of an injury, the victim's injury must be a direct and natural result of the defendant's actions; but-for-cause.
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
People v. Smith; second-degree felony murder conviction cannot stand when in it is based on a felony that is an integral part of the homicide and the evidence produced by the prosecution shows it to be an offense included in fact within homicide.
Honest Services Fraud
Honest Services Fraud
United States v. Rybicki; To establish honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1346, the evidence must show (1) a scheme or artifice to defraud; (2) for depriving another ofhonest services...; bribery; conflict of interest; kickback; self-dealing behavior.
Juvenile Rehabilitation
Juvenile Rehabilitation
Graham v. Florida; convicted juveniles must be give a reasonable chance at rehabilitation.
Question of Possession
Question of Possession
State v. Barger; new technology complicates questions of possession sufficient to establish criminal liability.