Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Securities Regulation  >  Nursing Home Pension Fund, Local 144 v. Oracle Corp.
Nursing Home Pension Fund, Local 144 v. Oracle Corp.
Nursing Home Pension Fund, Local 144 v. Oracle Corp. Cartoons

Nursing Home Pension Fund, Local 144 v. Oracle Corp.

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act; Connect the inferences fraud Rule 10b-5. Allegations in the complaint, taken together, must give rise to an inference that the defendant acted with the requisite scienter of false statements, knowing.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

The Wharf (Holdings) Limited v. United International Holdings, Inc.
The Wharf (Holdings) Limited v. United International Holdings, Inc.
Sale of securities falls under 10(b) of the Securites and Exchange Act of 1934; section 10(b) forbids the use of any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance relating to the sale of a security that is misleading or operates as a fraud or deceit.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. SG Ltd.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. SG Ltd.
Substance of a transaction; securities laws apply; pyramid scheme.
Mills v. Electric Auto Lite Company
Mills v. Electric Auto Lite Company
Materiality causality misstatement omission.
Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg
Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg
Directors opinions proxy statement rule 14a 9 and 14(a) knowingly false causation.
Robinson v. Glynn
Robinson v. Glynn
Ordinary business transactions common characteristics of stock corporation limited liability company security.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edwards
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edwards
Investment contract. definition of securities.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. GLT Dain Rauscher
Securities and Exchange Commission v. GLT Dain Rauscher
Securities professionals are held to a standard of reasonable prudence.
Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States
Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States
Affirmative fraud, rule 10-b5 violation, failure to disclose, causation, concealment, misrepresentation, reliance.
Corporate Fraud
Corporate Fraud
Think outside the box.
Asher v. Baxter International, Inc.
Asher v. Baxter International, Inc.
Under the safe-harbor provision of 27A of the Securities and Exchange Act, forward-looking statements must be accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements that adequately identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ.
Dura Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Broudo
Dura Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Broudo
Fraud on the market; In a securities fraud case, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant misrepresentations proximately caused the plaintiff economic loss.
Reliance On A Failure To Disclose
Reliance On A Failure To Disclose
Affiliate Ute Citizens v. United States; When liability under Rule 10b-5 is predicated on a defendant's failure to disclose a material fact, positive proof of reliance is not a prerequisite to recovery.