Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Contracts  >  Part Performance
Part Performance
Part Performance Cartoons

Part Performance

Beaver v. Brumlow; if oral contract not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds has been performed to such an extent it would be inequitable to deny enforcement, may bar the Statute of Frauds defense; part performance; specific performance.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Apparent Authority
Apparent Authority
Azur v. Chase Bank, USA; Unauthorized use of a credit card is use of the card by someone without actual, implied, or apparent authority to make charges, and from which the cardholder receives no benefit.
Statutes of Repose
Statutes of Repose
Peters v. Riggs Natl. Bank, N.A.; Equitable tolling does not apply to statutes of repose; statute of limitation; the time limit can be shortened by contract or mutual agreement.
Mutual Mistake
Mutual Mistake
Tracy v. Morell; even when there is no fraud, there may be mutual mistake; where both parties share a common false assumption about a vital fact upon which their bargain is based, the transaction may be avoided.
Extrinsic Evidence on Indefinite Term
Extrinsic Evidence on Indefinite Term
Vohs v. Donovan; A contract is not enforceable if an essential term is indefinite or a promise to perform is illusory, but may enforce if extrinsic evidence makes more definite and the promise to perform less illusory.
Preliminary Injunction Contract Term
Preliminary Injunction Contract Term
Ed Bertholet & Associates, Inc. v. Ed Stefanko; Contract provisions requiring the issuance of an injunction are not binding on the trial court; granting or denying a preliminary injunction rests within the trial court's equitable discretion,
Stale Debt
Stale Debt
First Hawaiian Bank v. Jack Zukerhorn; A new promise by the debtor to pay his debt, whether or not then barred by the applicable statute of limitations, binds the debtor for a new limitations period.
Moral Obligation is not Consideration
Moral Obligation is not Consideration
Harrington v. Taylor; A humanitarian act performed voluntarily is not sufficient consideration for a promise.
Puffery is not Fraud
Puffery is not Fraud
Speakers of Sports v. ProServ; A promise that is intended as aspirational, and that a reasonable person in the position of the promisee would understand as an expression of hope, is not an enforceable commitment.
Guardianship
Guardianship
Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. Denison; Guardianship proceedings are treated as providing public notice of the ward's incapacity, even though the other party to a particular transaction may have no knowledge or reason to know of the guardianship.
Repudiate a Contract
Repudiate a Contract
Rocheux Int'l of N.J. v. U.S. Merchants Fin. Group; whether one party repudiated a contract or provided adequate assurance of future performance are questions of fact that must be decided by the trier of fact based on commercial standards.
Clickwrap Agreement
Clickwrap Agreement
Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph, Inc.; When customers are given notice of the terms and conditions of a contract via a clickwrap agreement and must affirmatively manifest assent by clicking I Agree, the clickwrap agreements is valid.
Moral Obligation from Material Benefit
Moral Obligation from Material Benefit
Webb v. McGowin; the law recognizes a distinction between a promisor's moral obligation that results from a feeling of ethical obligation and one that results from conferring a material benefit to the promisor.