Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  People v. Burton
People v. Burton
People v. Burton Cartoons

People v. Burton

The underlying felony sufficient to trigger the felony-murder rule must involve an independent felonious purpose, lesser included offense.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

State v. Ochoa
State v. Ochoa
Person is an aider and abettor if he shares the criminal intent of the principal and acts in concert with the principal; Abet; accesory; aid and abet; incite; riot.
State v. Etzweiler
State v. Etzweiler
Accomplice will be liable only for crimes that he or she intended to facilitate. Negligent homicide.
Commonwealth v. Mitchneck
Commonwealth v. Mitchneck
Failing to pay money to a creditor under an agreement to pay the debt of another does not constitute fraudulent conversion, since the money at issue never belonged to the creditor; conversion novation.
The King v. Pear
The King v. Pear
If one rents property under false pretenses and fails to return it at the end of the lease time, and instead sells the property and keeps the money, he has committed a felony.
Common Law Misdemeanors
Common Law Misdemeanors
Commonwealth v. Mochan, misdemeanors may arise under state common law, acts against the public morality, Lawrence v. Texas, homosexuality.
Fair Warning In Legislation
Fair Warning In Legislation
McBoyle v. United States, legislation must be drafted in such a way as to give citizens fair warning of what conduct is encompassed within the statute, ejusdem generis.
Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia
The execution of a mentally retarded person is "cruel and unusual punishment" and therefore violates the Eighth Amendment.
Clark v. Arizona
Clark v. Arizona
Mens rae, under Arizona's Mott rule, a court will not allow evidence of a mental disorder short of insanity as bearing on a defendant's capacity to form specific intent.
Williams v. New York
Williams v. New York
Pre-sentence investigation, imposition of death sentence for murder in the first degree is not void under the Due Process Clause solely because trial court, before imposing sentence, considered additional information from probation department.
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Perez v. Cain; In a federal habeas proceeding, the standard is whether, after viewing evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Honest Services Fraud
Honest Services Fraud
United States v. Rybicki; To establish honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1346, the evidence must show (1) a scheme or artifice to defraud; (2) for depriving another ofhonest services...; bribery; conflict of interest; kickback; self-dealing behavior.
Reasonable Man Test
Reasonable Man Test
Director of Public Prosecutions v. Camplin; the reasonable man standard is a person having the power of self-control to be expected of an ordinary person of the same sex and age as the accused.