Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  People v. Lubow
People v. Lubow
People v. Lubow Cartoons

People v. Lubow

Proof of the crime of solicitation is complete upon proof of the communication; it does not require an overt act in furtherance nor does it even require proof of delivery of the solicitation to the intended target; criminal solicitation.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

State v. Hunter
State v. Hunter
Compulsion is not a defense to homicide charge unless charge is felony murder. Felony murder rule.
People v. Wilhelm
People v. Wilhelm
Rape shield; evidence of victim's sexual conduct with a third party is irrelevant to the issue of whether she consented to sexual intercourse with the defendant; public, provocative displays may or may not be admissible in rape trials.
Latimer v. The Queen
Latimer v. The Queen
Mercy killing is murder; for defense of necessity to apply, there must be an urgent situation of clear and imminent peril, no reasonable legal alternative to disobeying the law, and proportionality between the harm inflicted and the harm avoided.
The Sentencing Reform Act
The Sentencing Reform Act
United States v. Gementera, judge force convict to declare crime in public, The Sentencing Reform Act affords courts broad discretion in fashioning conditions of supervised release reasonably related to nature and circumstances of offense.
Common Law Misdemeanors
Common Law Misdemeanors
Commonwealth v. Mochan, misdemeanors may arise under state common law, acts against the public morality, Lawrence v. Texas, homosexuality.
United States v. Thompson
United States v. Thompson
Downward departure, under federal sentencing guidelines, courts may order a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines based on extraordinary family circumstances.
Ewing v. California
Ewing v. California
Three strikes law, Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, deterrence, proportionality, recidivism, rehabilitation.
Mayberry Instruction Must Have Evidence of Mistaken Belief
Mayberry Instruction Must Have Evidence of Mistaken Belief
People v. Williams; trial court must give instruction on mistaken belief to consent to intercourse in rape case only when the defense is supported by substantial evidence sufficient to deserve consideration by jury.
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Perez v. Cain; In a federal habeas proceeding, the standard is whether, after viewing evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Perjury By Implication Not Allowed
Perjury By Implication Not Allowed
Bronston v. United States; To support a perjury conviction, a witness must actually willfully state a material matter that he does not believe to be true.
Viability Standard for Fetus
Viability Standard for Fetus
Keeler v. Superior Court; viability of the embryo was not the standard for human being in California in the 1970's.
Signing With A Fictitious Name
Signing With A Fictitious Name
United States v. Moore; signing for an express mail delivery with a fictitious name violates federal law.