Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  People v. Wilhelm
People v. Wilhelm
People v. Wilhelm Cartoons

People v. Wilhelm

Rape shield; evidence of victim's sexual conduct with a third party is irrelevant to the issue of whether she consented to sexual intercourse with the defendant; public, provocative displays may or may not be admissible in rape trials.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

State v. Hunter
State v. Hunter
Compulsion is not a defense to homicide charge unless charge is felony murder. Felony murder rule.
People v. Serravo
People v. Serravo
Applying statutory definition of insanity, right and wrong are measured by existing societal standards of morality rather defendant's personal and subjective understanding of illegality of act. Insane; insanity defense; not guilty by reason of insanity.
United States v. Diaz
United States v. Diaz
Participant in a conspiracy is criminally liable for all acts that are done by other members in furtherance of the conspiracy and that are reasonably foreseeable as a necessary consequence of the unlawful agreement.
Commonwealth v. McIlwain School Bus Lines
Commonwealth v. McIlwain School Bus Lines
Corporation may be held criminally liable for vehicular homicide when the definition of person in the homicide statute extends beyond that of natural person. Ultra vires.
Boro v. People
Boro v. People
Consent to an act of sexual intercourse will bar prosecution for rape, even when consent was obtained by fraud, if victim knew that she was consenting to an act of sexual intercourse. Fraud in the factum; fraud in the inducement; prohibition.
General Deterrence and Sentencing
General Deterrence and Sentencing
United States v. Milken, individual deterrence, general deterrence, punishment, retribution, and rehabilitation, appropriate criminal sentence.
The Rule of Lenity
The Rule of Lenity
United States v. Dauray, The rule of lenity requires that ambiguities in a criminal statute be resolved in the defendant's favor, noscitur a socis.
Knowingly Commit Each Element of Offense
Knowingly Commit Each Element of Offense
Flores-Figueroa v. United States; Courts ordinarily read a phrase in a criminal statute that introduces the elements of a crime with the word "knowingly" as applying that word to each element of the offense; identity theft.
Failure to Alleviate Risk
Failure to Alleviate Risk
Commonwealth v. Levesque; criminal liability is possible for failure to alleviate risk that the defendant created.
Juvenile Rehabilitation
Juvenile Rehabilitation
Graham v. Florida; convicted juveniles must be give a reasonable chance at rehabilitation.
Withdrawing From Complicity Requires Affirmative Act
Withdrawing From Complicity Requires Affirmative Act
State v. Formella; withrawal from consipiracy requires an affirmative act and communication to the other consipirators is helpful.
Good Faith Mistake of Fact
Good Faith Mistake of Fact
Commonwealth v. Sherry; wheter a reasonable good-faith mistake of fact as to consent is a defense to the crime of rape;