Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Contracts  >  Repudiate a Contract
Repudiate a Contract
Repudiate a Contract Cartoons

Repudiate a Contract

Rocheux Int'l of N.J. v. U.S. Merchants Fin. Group; whether one party repudiated a contract or provided adequate assurance of future performance are questions of fact that must be decided by the trier of fact based on commercial standards.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Financing Statement Search
Financing Statement Search
In re John\'s Bean Farm of Homestead, Inc.; bankruptcy; wrong name; computer search string; incorrect identification of a debtor on a financing statement is seriously misleading.
Undue Influence
Undue Influence
Kelly v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.; Undue influence is persuasion that tends to be coercive in nature and that overcomes the will without convincing the judgment.
Construction Defect Damages
Construction Defect Damages
Landis v. William Fannin Builders, Inc.; damages in an action for breach of a construction contract is the cost to repair the deficient work; economic waste doctrine.
Online Agreements
Online Agreements
Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.; clicking on a DOWNLOAD button does not communicate assent to contractual terms if the offer did not make clear; inquiry notice; constructive notice.
Material Breach of Contract
Material Breach of Contract
Strouth v. Pools by Murphy and Sons, Inc.; A material breach of a contract by one party justifies the other party's termination of the agreement. Substantial performance doctrine.
Contractual Basis for Arbitration
Contractual Basis for Arbitration
Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.; A party may not be compelled under the FAA to submit to class arbitration unless there is a contractual basis for concluding that the party agreed to do so. Federal Arbitration Act.
Part Performance
Part Performance
Beaver v. Brumlow; if oral contract not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds has been performed to such an extent it would be inequitable to deny enforcement, may bar the Statute of Frauds defense; part performance; specific performance.
Third Party Beneficiary Not Explicit
Third Party Beneficiary Not Explicit
Detroit Institute of Arts Founders Society v. Rose; A contract may create an obligation to a third-party without containing express language creating that obligation. Incidental benefit to third party not enough.
Induce Detrimental Reliance
Induce Detrimental Reliance
Drennan v. Star Paving Co.; A promise the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance of a definite and substantial character and that does is binding if neccessary to avoid injustice.
Unilateral Mistake Avoidance
Unilateral Mistake Avoidance
Sumerel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; If an offer contains a material mistake that was known by the other party, or the other had reason to know of it, the party who made the mistake has the power to avoid the contract.
Windfall Damages
Windfall Damages
H-W-H Cattle Co., Inc. v. Schroeder; Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a buyer has two options when the seller fails to deliver: (1) the buyer may "cover" by making a good faith substitute purchase; or (2) recover damages for non-delivery.
Promise to Impregnate
Promise to Impregnate
Perry v. Atkinson; there is no cause of action for the fraudulent breach of a promise to impregnate. Certain sexual conduct and interpersonal decisions are, on public policy grounds, outside the realm of tort liability.