Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Contracts  >  Reward for Police Officers
Reward for Police Officers
Reward for Police Officers Cartoons

Reward for Police Officers

Gray v. Martino; Public policy and sound morals alike forbid that public officers should demand or receive, for services performed in the discharge of their official duties.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Fraudulent Transfer
Fraudulent Transfer
Aptix Corp. v. Quickturn Design Systems, Inc.; A transfer is fraudulent if made with the actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor; loan was a fraudulent transfer. Badges of Fraud.
U.C.C.
U.C.C.
Central Washington Refrigeration, Inc. v. Barbee; Uniform Commercial Code; indemnity actions are governed by separate statute of limitation; implied right of indemnity; separate equitable cause of action; UCC.
Premises Liability
Premises Liability
Flippo v. Mode O'Day Frock Shops of Hollywood; implied warranty of merchantability; defect that attaches itself to product is not product defect or breach of warranty.
Prevention Doctrine
Prevention Doctrine
Berry v. Time Insurance Co.; implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; duty of good faith; duty to prevent injury.
Binding Agreement
Binding Agreement
Grosvenor v. Qwest Corp.; multiple notices to internet user of specific contractual terms of use may cause binding agreement.
Undue Influence
Undue Influence
Kelly v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.; Undue influence is persuasion that tends to be coercive in nature and that overcomes the will without convincing the judgment.
Agreement to Arbitrate
Agreement to Arbitrate
Rent-A-Center v. Jackson; The Federal Arbitration Act puts arbitration agreements on equal footing with other contracts, and requires courts to enforce them according to their terms; unconscionability challenges.
Liquidated Damages in Consumer Contracts
Liquidated Damages in Consumer Contracts
Cellphone Termination Fee Cases; Liquidated damages provisions in consumer contracts are presumed void, and the burden is on the proponent of such clauses to rebut that presumption.
Detrimental Reliance
Detrimental Reliance
Frank Dixon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; promissory estoppel will be applied when the promisor makes a promise that the promisee reasonably and foreseeably relies on to his or her detriment.
Unilateral Mistake Avoidance
Unilateral Mistake Avoidance
Sumerel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; If an offer contains a material mistake that was known by the other party, or the other had reason to know of it, the party who made the mistake has the power to avoid the contract.
Pre-Contractual Misrepresentations
Pre-Contractual Misrepresentations
Snyder v. Lovercheck; a perpetrator of fraud cannot close the lips of his innocent victim by getting him blindly to agree in advance not to complain against it as a matter of public policy.
Implied in Law Contract
Implied in Law Contract
Vertex, Inc. v. City of Waterbury; unjust enrichment requires (1) that the defendants were benefited, (2) that the defendants unjustly did not pay the plaintiffs for the benefits, and (3) that the failure of payment was to the plaintiffs' detriment.