Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Employment  >  Sauerland v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
Sauerland v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
Sauerland v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission Cartoons

Sauerland v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

A single act of misconduct involving dishonesty or a critical offense may disqualify a discharged employee from receiving unemployment benefits.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Barnhart v. Thomas
Barnhart v. Thomas
Ineligible for benefits, Social Security Act, Social Security Administration.
Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Co.
Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Co.
Workers compensation insurance, employee benefit plan, bankruptcy, ERISA, Chapter 11.
Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc.
Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc.
Gender-specific employment policies, discrimination.
Lomack v. City of Newark
Lomack v. City of Newark
Diversity policies, racial balance, affirmative action, equal protection, strict scrutiny, suspect classification.
New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance Company
New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance Company
ERISA does not preempt state laws, indirect economic effect on ERISA, Employee Retirement Income Security Act, health-maintenance organization.
Stone Container Corp. v. Castle
Stone Container Corp. v. Castle
Compensable appliance, workers compensation insurance.
Tri-County Youth Programs, Inc. v. Acting Deputy Director of the Division of Employment & Training
Tri-County Youth Programs, Inc. v. Acting Deputy Director of the Division of Employment & Training
Sexual harassment, good cause attributable to the employer to quit, hostile environment.
Williams v. Mohawk Industries., Inc.
Williams v. Mohawk Industries., Inc.
Civil RICO claim, pattern of racketeering activity, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Protected activity under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, retaliate against, retaliatory discharge, Whistleblower Act.
Cat's Paw Theory
Cat's Paw Theory
Staub v. Proctor Hospital; Under the cat's paw theory, discriminatory animus of non-decisionmakers can be imputed to decisionmakers only when the non-decisionmaker has a singular influence over the decisionmaker and uses that influence.
Employer's Customer Lists Are Confidential And Proprietary
Employer's Customer Lists Are Confidential And Proprietary
Lamorte Burns & Co. v. Walters; Specific information provided by employer to employee, in course of employment, and for sole purpose of servicing employer's customers, is legally protectable as confidential proprietary information.
Notice Period For Mass Layoffs
Notice Period For Mass Layoffs
Gross v. Hale-Halsell Co. An employer may order a plant closing or mass layoff before the conclusion of the statutory sixty-day notice period if the closing or mass layoff is caused by business circumstances that were not reasonably foreseeable.