Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Torts  >  Schools Have a Duty to Protect Students
Schools Have a Duty to Protect Students
Schools Have a Duty to Protect Students Cartoons

Schools Have a Duty to Protect Students

Christensen v. Royal School District No. 160; Contributory fault may not be assessed against thirteen-year-old child based on failure to protect from sexual abuse when defendant stands in special relationship to child and has duty to protect child.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Damage Limits in Maritime Cases
Damage Limits in Maritime Cases
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker; In maritime cases, compensatory and punitive damages should be limited to a 1:1 ratio.; malice; remittur.
The Medical Devise Amendments Prempt State Law
The Medical Devise Amendments Prempt State Law
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.; The Medical Device Amendments preempt state requirements that are different from, or in addition to, any requirements applicable to a medical device under federal law; preemption.
Remedy for Breach of Contract is not Tort Action
Remedy for Breach of Contract is not Tort Action
Spengler v. ADT Security Services, Inc; under Michigan law action for an action in tort to arise out of a breach of contract, the act complained of must constitute (1) a breach of duty separate and distinct from the breach of contract, and (2) active negligence.
Loss of Chance In Medical Malpractice
Loss of Chance In Medical Malpractice
Matsuyama v. Birnbaum. When a physician's negligence reduces or eliminates the patient's prospects for achieving a more favorable medical outcome, the physician has harmed the patient and is liable for damages. Wrongful Death Action.
Lead Paint Case
Lead Paint Case
State of Rhode Island v. Lead Industries Association, Inc. A public nuisance is an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public by a person or persons with control over the instrumentality alleged to have created the nuisance.
No Joint and Several Liability
No Joint and Several Liability
Board of County Commissioners of Teton County v. Bassett; each defendant in a case is liable only to the extent of that defendant's proportion of the total fault in Wyoming.
No Claim for Emotional Distress
No Claim for Emotional Distress
Catron v. Lewis; an action for negligent infliction of emotional distress must show either (1) reasonably foreseeably "bystander" victim based on an intimate familial relationship, or (2) a "direct victim" because was within the zone of danger.
Vicarious Liability
Vicarious Liability
Mavrikidis v. Petullo; when a person engages a contractor, who conducts an independent business by means of his own employees, he is not liable for the negligent acts of the contractor.
Parental Immunity Doctrine
Parental Immunity Doctrine
Neel v. Sewell; claims of negligent supervision are properly viewed as involving the exercise of reasonable parental authority over a child, and are thus barred by parental immunity.
Self Defense for Physical Harm Only
Self Defense for Physical Harm Only
Touchet v. Hampton; mere words, even though designed to excite or irritate, cannot excuse a battery. The privilege of self-defense is based on the prevention of harm to the actor, not on the desire for retaliation or revenge.
Child Liability in Tort
Child Liability in Tort
Van Camp v. McAfoos; A child cannot be held liable in tort without some allegation of negligence or wrongful conduct on his or her part.
Online Writings are Defamatory
Online Writings are Defamatory
Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Delfino; written defamatory communications published by means of the Internet are properly characterized as libel, not slander. No prior restraint.