Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Selective Prosecution
Selective Prosecution
Selective Prosecution Cartoons

Selective Prosecution

United States v. Armstrong; claim of selective prosecution based on race; claimant must produce evidence that similarly situated offenders of a different race could have been prosecuted but were not.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Brown v. Ohio
Brown v. Ohio
Double jeopardy. a conviction of a lesser-included offense precludes a subsequent prosecution for the greater offense even though the two actions occurred several days apart.
Harris v. Oklahoma
Harris v. Oklahoma
When the conviction of a greater crime cannot be had without conviction of a lesser crime, the double jeopardy clause bars prosecution for the lesser crime after conviction for the greater crime.
Smith v. Texas
Smith v. Texas
See also similar holdings in Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman and Brewer v. Quarterman.
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
Highway checkpoints are unconstitutional when used for ordinary law enforcement purposes to advance a general interest in ordinary crime control.
Sixth Amendment Right to Representation of Counsel
Sixth Amendment Right to Representation of Counsel
United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez; wrongful denial of the right to counsel of the defendant's choosing is a structural error (fundamental error) not subject to harmless-error review; pro hac vice.
Search of Vehicle Incident to Arrest
Search of Vehicle Incident to Arrest
Arizona v. Gant; Police may search vehicle incident to recent occupant's arrest only if arrestee is within reaching distance of passenger compartment at time search or reasonable to believe vehicle contains evidence offense of arrest; stare decisis.
Sentencing Judges May Consider Various Factors
Sentencing Judges May Consider Various Factors
Kimbrough v. United States; Under Booker, the cocaine Guidelines, like all other Sentencing Guidelines, are advisory only.
Right to Counsel
Right to Counsel
Texas v. Cobb; the Sixth Amendment right to counsel only attaches to the offense charged.
Exclusionary Rule
Exclusionary Rule
Davis v. United States; deterrent effect of exclusionary rule; deter Fourth Amendment violations by police and law enforcement; Arizona v. Gant.
Eyewitness Identification
Eyewitness Identification
Perry v. New Hampshire; suppress evidence of eyewitness identification; overly suggestive; police standing with suspect; reliability of identification; Due Process.
Cheek Swab
Cheek Swab
Maryland v. King; taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee's DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, is a legitimate police booking procedure and is reasonable under the Four Amendment. DNA cheek swab.
Inffective Assistance of Counsel Standard
Inffective Assistance of Counsel Standard
Premo v. Moore; The Sixth Amendment requires reasonable competence in representing the accused, but substantial deference must be afforded to counsel's judgment. Habeas relief standard. Supress confession.