Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Stack v. Boyle
Stack v. Boyle
Stack v. Boyle Cartoons

Stack v. Boyle

Under the eighth amendment, bail must be reasonably fixed to ensure a defendant will appear at trial based on the specific facts of the crime charged and not the character of the crime. Excessive bail.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Cruz v. New York
Cruz v. New York
When a non-testifying codefendant confession incriminating defendant is not directly admissible against defendant, the confrontation clause bars its admission at their joint trial, even if the jury is instructed not to consider it against the defendant.
Wainwright v. Sykes
Wainwright v. Sykes
Contemporaneous objection rule. absent a showing of cause and prejudice attendant to a state procedural waiver, a federal habeas corpus review of a waived objection to the admission of a confession at trial is barred. Coram nobis.
Smith v. Murray
Smith v. Murray
A habeas corpus petition should be dismissed if, in the absence of any cause or prejudice, the underlying constitutional claim was not first raised in a state proceeding on direct appeal.
Chavez v. Martinez
Chavez v. Martinez
Self-incrimination impossible when there is no trial; violation of right against self-incrimination occurs only when one is compelled to be a witness against himself in a criminal case.
Hoffman v. United States
Hoffman v. United States
Fifth Amendment applies to grand jury testimony; privilege against self-incrimination may be invoked if there is a possibility that the answers sought would have a tendency to incriminate the witness.
Sentencing Judges May Consider Various Factors
Sentencing Judges May Consider Various Factors
Kimbrough v. United States; Under Booker, the cocaine Guidelines, like all other Sentencing Guidelines, are advisory only.
Appellate Court Review of Sentencing
Appellate Court Review of Sentencing
Rita v. United States; An appellate court may apply a non-binding presumption that a sentencing court's imposition of a within-Guidelines sentence is reasonable; presumption.
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
When a vehicle is stopped at a traffic stop, the passenger as well as the driver is seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment for search and seizure.
Probable Cause
Probable Cause
Brendlin v. California; fruit of the poisonous tree; officers did not have probable cause to stop vehicle, passenger was seized and evidence discovered as result was inadmissible.
Checkpoints
Checkpoints
Illinois v. Lidster; traffic checkpoints may be part of a criminal investigation.
Attachment of Right To Counsel
Attachment of Right To Counsel
Rothgery v. Gillespie County. A criminal defendant's initial appearance before a judicial officer triggers the attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Brewer v. Williams and Michigan v. Jackson.
Fourth Amendment Email Protection
Fourth Amendment Email Protection
United States v. Warshak; email is subject to the Fourth Amendment so will protect an individual's privacy interest. A search warrant is necessary. Katz. Miller. Jackson.