Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  The King v. Pear
The King v. Pear
The King v. Pear Cartoons

The King v. Pear

If one rents property under false pretenses and fails to return it at the end of the lease time, and instead sells the property and keeps the money, he has committed a felony.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

State v. Etzweiler
State v. Etzweiler
Accomplice will be liable only for crimes that he or she intended to facilitate. Negligent homicide.
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt
In Re Winship, In juvenile court, guilt of criminal charges must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Sentencing Reform Act
The Sentencing Reform Act
United States v. Gementera, judge force convict to declare crime in public, The Sentencing Reform Act affords courts broad discretion in fashioning conditions of supervised release reasonably related to nature and circumstances of offense.
Mens Rae
Mens Rae
B (A Minor) v. Director of Public Prosecutions, Absent legislative direction, the common law presumes that an accused's honest belief that negates the requisite mens rea of the crime is a valid defense.
People v. Hall
People v. Hall
Ski accident, Whether a risk of death is substantial and unjustifiable must be determined based on the circumstances of each case.
But-For-Cause of Injury
But-For-Cause of Injury
People v. Rideout; For a defendant's conduct to constitute the proximate cause of an injury, the victim's injury must be a direct and natural result of the defendant's actions; but-for-cause.
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide
People v. Smith; second-degree felony murder conviction cannot stand when in it is based on a felony that is an integral part of the homicide and the evidence produced by the prosecution shows it to be an offense included in fact within homicide.
Involutarily Commit Sexual Predators
Involutarily Commit Sexual Predators
Kansas v. Hendricks; Where a civil commitment statute does not seek retribution or deterrence, it does not establish punitive criminal proceedings necessary to uphold double jeopardy and ex post facto claims.
Honest Services Fraud
Honest Services Fraud
United States v. Rybicki; To establish honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1346, the evidence must show (1) a scheme or artifice to defraud; (2) for depriving another ofhonest services...; bribery; conflict of interest; kickback; self-dealing behavior.
Factors Determining If In Possession of Drugs
Factors Determining If In Possession of Drugs
Smith v. State; Several factors, no one of which is conclusive, determine if defendant was "in possession" of drugs: proximity, in plain view, indicia of mutual use and enjoyment, and ownership or possessory interest in location where discovered.
Signing With A Fictitious Name
Signing With A Fictitious Name
United States v. Moore; signing for an express mail delivery with a fictitious name violates federal law.
Defense of Habitation
Defense of Habitation
State v. Boyett; entry to home not required for defense of habitation, but habitation defense not applicable if victim was fleeing.