Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Contracts  >  Tortious Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage
Tortious Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage
Tortious Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage Cartoons

Tortious Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage

Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.; established contracts merit greater protection than potential contracts.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Price Setting
Price Setting
Casserlie v. Shell Oil Co.; claim for bad faith price setting; a price in an open price contract is set in good faith if it is commercially reasonable and nondiscriminatory; disparate pricing between jobbers and dealers is not evidence of discrimination
Wire Transfer
Wire Transfer
Experi-Metal, Inc. v. Comerica Bank; authenticity of payment orders must be verified pursuant to a comercially reasonable security procedure; unauthorized wire transfer order.
Prevention Doctrine
Prevention Doctrine
Berry v. Time Insurance Co.; implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; duty of good faith; duty to prevent injury.
Expectation Damages
Expectation Damages
Dynalectric Co., Inc. v. Clark & Sullivan Constructors, Inc.; promissory estoppel; general contractor; subcontractor; reliance damages; restitution damages.
Doctrine of Avoidable Consequences
Doctrine of Avoidable Consequences
In re WorldCom, Inc.; the duty to mitigate damages bars recovery for losses suffered by a non-breaching party that could have been avoided by reasonable effort and without the risk of substantial loss or injury.
Construction Defect Damages
Construction Defect Damages
Landis v. William Fannin Builders, Inc.; damages in an action for breach of a construction contract is the cost to repair the deficient work; economic waste doctrine.
Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel
Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel
Stewart v. Cendant Mobility Services Corp.; a promise that the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance and does is binding if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise.
Letters of Intent
Letters of Intent
Empro Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Ball-Co Manufacturing, Inc.; an agreement that is made subject to a later agreement is not sufficiently definite to be a binding contract.
As Is Clause
As Is Clause
Lenawee County Board of Health v. William and Martha Messerly; as-is clause may defeat grant of rescission for mutual mistake relating to a basic assumption that materially affects the parties' agreed performance.
Detrimental Reliance Promissory Estoppel
Detrimental Reliance Promissory Estoppel
Wright v. Newman; If the promises in connection with an invalid and unenforceable contract wrongfully cause a party to forgo a valuable legal right to his detriment, and promisor waives the right to repudiate the contract, the contract is enforceable.
Implied in Law Contract
Implied in Law Contract
Vertex, Inc. v. City of Waterbury; unjust enrichment requires (1) that the defendants were benefited, (2) that the defendants unjustly did not pay the plaintiffs for the benefits, and (3) that the failure of payment was to the plaintiffs' detriment.
Moral Obligation is Consideration
Moral Obligation is Consideration
Webb v. McGowin; a moral obligation is sufficient consideration for a subsequent promise if the promisor has received a material benefit, even if the promisor had no original duty or liability.