Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  Trammel v. United States
Trammel v. United States
Trammel v. United States Cartoons

Trammel v. United States

Witness may be neither compelled to testify nor barred from testifying against his or her spouse. Privilege for marital communications; marital privilege.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

In Re Melton
In Re Melton
Expert opinions may be based on hearsay that meets minimum standards of reliability. Civil commitment.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
General acceptance is not precondition to admissibility of scientific evidence as long as expert testimony rests on reliable foundation and is relevant to issues in the case.
United States v. Stelmokas
United States v. Stelmokas
Authentication. Requirement that document be authenticated before it may be admitted into evidence is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support finding that document is what its proponent claims it to be. Chain of custody.
Simms v. Dixon
Simms v. Dixon
Foundation; authentication. Photograph is authenticated for evidentiary purposes if witness with knowledge of facts is able to testify that photograph is correct portrayal of those facts. Foundation.
Shepard v. United States
Shepard v. United States
Declaration of person's state of mind is inadmissible to prove the actions of someone other than the declarant.
Campbell v. Delbridge
Campbell v. Delbridge
Emotional distress; issues in medical malpractice case that are only peripheral to medical decisions do not require expert testimony.
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause
Crawford v. Washington; for out-of-court statement to be admitted into evidence, the witness must be unavailable and the defendant must have had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.
Telephone Call As Admissable Evidence
Telephone Call As Admissable Evidence
State v. Small; a voice over the telephone may be identified as being that of a particular person if there is evidence that shows the person identified is the only one who could have uttered the speech under the circumstances.
Silence May or May Not Be Admissable Testimony
Silence May or May Not Be Admissable Testimony
Wilson v. Clancy; Under Fed R. Civ. P. 56(c), in order to create a triable issue of fact, affidavits must contain evidence that would be admissible at trial; affidavit; inference; joint tenancy; right of survivorship; summary judgment.
Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders
Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders
U.S. v. Amado-Nunez; The whole range of human experience, from the rough meaning of common terms to human psychology, and which may properly enter into the fact-finder's decision-making process without the need for direct evidence.
Client Identities Are Not Attorney Client Privilege
Client Identities Are Not Attorney Client Privilege
In Re Osterhoudt; Identity of attorney's client and nature of fee agreement are not protected by attorney-client privilege, unless disclosure of the information would implicate the client in the criminal activity for which legal advice was sought.
Best Evidence Rule Computer Records
Best Evidence Rule Computer Records
United States v. Diaz-Lopez; best evidence rule does not apply to testimony that records have been examined and found not to contain any reference to a designated matter.