Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  United States v. Batchelder
United States v. Batchelder
United States v. Batchelder Cartoons

United States v. Batchelder

Identical substantive criminal statutes do not offend due process by establishing different sentencing provisions available upon conviction. Sentence.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Mistretta v. United States
Mistretta v. United States
Sentencing guidelines are constitutional, amounting to neither an excessive delegation of legislative power nor a violation of the separation of powers principle. Indeterminate sentence.
United States v. Harrington
United States v. Harrington
Sentencing guidelines often produce harsh results that are patently unfair because they fail to take into account individual circumstances.
Brown v. Ohio
Brown v. Ohio
Double jeopardy. a conviction of a lesser-included offense precludes a subsequent prosecution for the greater offense even though the two actions occurred several days apart.
Bartkus v. Illinois
Bartkus v. Illinois
Autrefois. successive federal and state prosecutions do not violate the fifth amendment s double jeopardy clause. Sovereignty.
Smith v. Texas
Smith v. Texas
See also similar holdings in Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman and Brewer v. Quarterman.
Entrapment Defense
Entrapment Defense
Sherman v. United States; repeated requests to commit a crime and pleas for sympathy establish entrapment; if defendant's criminal conduct arises from the inducement of law enforcement officers, not the intention of the defendant.
Employer Listening to Private Employee Telephone Conversations
Employer Listening to Private Employee Telephone Conversations
Deal v. Spears; Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1996 creates exception to civil liability for aural interception during business use of a telephone extension; scope of exception limited to the business purpose.
Totality of the Circumstances
Totality of the Circumstances
United States v. Arvizu; reasonable suspicion is based on the totality of the circumstances.
Age as Miranda Custody Factor
Age as Miranda Custody Factor
J.D.B. v. North Carolina; A child's age properly informs the Miranda custody analysis because children may not feel free to terminate interrogation.
Invoke Miranda Rights
Invoke Miranda Rights
Berghuis v. Thompkins; a suspect invoking his Miranda rights must do so unambiguously.
Exclusionary Rule
Exclusionary Rule
Davis v. United States; deterrent effect of exclusionary rule; deter Fourth Amendment violations by police and law enforcement; Arizona v. Gant.
Eyewitness Identification
Eyewitness Identification
Perry v. New Hampshire; suppress evidence of eyewitness identification; overly suggestive; police standing with suspect; reliability of identification; Due Process.