United States v. Crumby

Description
Customer Reviews

Polygraph evidence will be admitted for limited purpose of impeaching or corroborating credibility of defendant who testifies.

Your Price: $10.00

Quantity

Hygh v. Jacobs

Expert testimony is not allowed on legal conclusions that are to be reached by jury.

Commonwealth v. Stockhammer

When defendant requests access to privileged records, counsel for defendant should be allowed to examine records in order to determine what is necessary for defense.

Fisher v. United States

Client documents in possession of lawyer are protected by attorney client privilege only if Fifth Amendment privilege would have protected while in client's possession and documents given to lawyer for purpose of obtaining legal advice.

United States v. Rakes

privilege for marital communications permits individual to refuse to testify, and to prevent spouse or former spouse from testifying, regarding any confidential communication made by individual to spouse during the of marriage. Extortion misprison.

Shepard v. United States

Declaration of person's state of mind is inadmissible to prove the actions of someone other than the declarant.

Hearsay Within Hearsay Can Be Admissable

Sana v. Hawaiian Cruises, Ltd; For documents to be admissible, each layer of hearsay within them must satisfy an exception to the hearsay rule; business-records exception; Jones Act; maintenance and cure.

Defendant May Introduce Evidence of Third Party's Guilt

Holmes v. South Carolina; Rules of evidence in criminal trials may not be arbitrary, must be focused on the central issues in the case, and must be applied to afford the defendant a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.

Judicial Notice of Fact

Fielding v. State; When a court takes judicial notice of a fact in a criminal case, the court must instruct the jury that it may, but is not required to, accept as conclusive any fact so judicially noticed; directed verdict; harmless error; jury instruction.

Rebuttable Presumption

In re Nicholas H; The presumption that a man holding out a child as his own is the parent of that child is rebuttable, by clear and convincing evidence that is not the biological parent; presumption of paternity; rebuttable presumption.

Marital Privilege

United States v. Montgomery; the marital communications privilege applies to all private communications between spouses in a valid marriage unless evidence shows they were not intended to be confidential.

Authentication of Evidence

Griffin v. State; authentication of evidence; authenticate printout of page from social network website.

Inadmissable Dying Declaration

State v. Williams; Expression of opinion is inadmissable hearsay even if declarant thought death was imminent; hearsay rule.

Shopping Bag

United States v. Crumby

Price

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons