United States v. Diaz

Description
Customer Reviews

Participant in a conspiracy is criminally liable for all acts that are done by other members in furtherance of the conspiracy and that are reasonably foreseeable as a necessary consequence of the unlawful agreement.

Your Price: $10.00

Quantity

State v. Hunter

Compulsion is not a defense to homicide charge unless charge is felony murder. Felony murder rule.

People v. Serravo

Applying statutory definition of insanity, right and wrong are measured by existing societal standards of morality rather defendant's personal and subjective understanding of illegality of act. Insane; insanity defense; not guilty by reason of insanity.

State v. Christy Pontiac-GMC, Inc.

Corporation may be convicted of specific-intent crime when agent of corporation takes illegal acts in furtherance of the corporate business interests; alter ego; commercial crime; corporate crime; legal fiction; specific intent; swindle.

Commonwealth v. Mitchneck

Failing to pay money to a creditor under an agreement to pay the debt of another does not constitute fraudulent conversion, since the money at issue never belonged to the creditor; conversion novation.

General Deterrence and Sentencing

United States v. Milken, individual deterrence, general deterrence, punishment, retribution, and rehabilitation, appropriate criminal sentence.

Criminal Laws on Homosexuality

Lawrence v. Texas, state laws criminalizing homosexual relations violate substantive due process.

People v. Hall

Ski accident, Whether a risk of death is substantial and unjustifiable must be determined based on the circumstances of each case.

Atkins v. Virginia

The execution of a mentally retarded person is "cruel and unusual punishment" and therefore violates the Eighth Amendment.

Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller

Selective prosecution, courts are reluctant to interfere with prosecutorial discretion.

Liability For Ownership of Vicious Dogs

People v. Knoller; Malice, to satisfy the elements of second-degree murder, requires a defendant's awareness of the risk of death to another; objective; subjective.

Withdrawing From Consipiracy Requires Affirmative Act

State v. Formella; An individual is criminally liable for the conduct of another when he acts as an accomplice by promoting or facilitating, or by aiding, or agreeing or attempting to aid, another person in planning or committing the offense.

Withdrawing From Complicity Requires Affirmative Act

State v. Formella; withrawal from consipiracy requires an affirmative act and communication to the other consipirators is helpful.

Shopping Bag

United States v. Diaz

Price

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons