Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  United States v. Hubbell
United States v. Hubbell
United States v. Hubbell Cartoons

United States v. Hubbell

Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination protects witness from being compelled to answer questions about existence of sources of potentially incriminating evidence and from subpoena seeking discovery. Transactional immunity.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

White v. Illinois
White v. Illinois
Excited utterance. Confrontation Clause does not require a showing of necessity before statements may be admitted under a hearsay exception.
United States v. Hines
United States v. Hines
Expert testimony may be introduced on matters ordinarily within understanding of jury if the inferences jury may draw on subject could be erroneous.
United States v. Crumby
United States v. Crumby
Polygraph evidence will be admitted for limited purpose of impeaching or corroborating credibility of defendant who testifies.
United States v. Doe
United States v. Doe
If act of producing documents would be incriminating, production of those documents cannot be compelled without statutory grant of use immunity.
Silence May or May Not Be Admissable Testimony
Silence May or May Not Be Admissable Testimony
Wilson v. Clancy; Under Fed R. Civ. P. 56(c), in order to create a triable issue of fact, affidavits must contain evidence that would be admissible at trial; affidavit; inference; joint tenancy; right of survivorship; summary judgment.
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd; The residual hearsay exceptions should be used very rarely, and only in exceptional and unanticipated circumstances that are not specifically covered by particular exceptions.
Hypnotism Not Allowed To Refresh Memory
Hypnotism Not Allowed To Refresh Memory
State v. Moore; The hypnotically refreshed testimony of a witness in a criminal trial is generally inadmissible.
Judicial Notice of Fact
Judicial Notice of Fact
Fielding v. State; When a court takes judicial notice of a fact in a criminal case, the court must instruct the jury that it may, but is not required to, accept as conclusive any fact so judicially noticed; directed verdict; harmless error; jury instruction.
Lie Detector Test
Lie Detector Test
United States v. Semrau; admissibility of lie detector test; expert testimony; reliability of scientific evidence; Daubert hearing.
Admissability of Suicide Note
Admissability of Suicide Note
Garza v. Delta Tau Delta Fraternity National; dying declaration; hearsay rule; statement made by the declarant while believing her death was imminent.
Best Evidence Rule Computer Records
Best Evidence Rule Computer Records
United States v. Diaz-Lopez; best evidence rule does not apply to testimony that records have been examined and found not to contain any reference to a designated matter.
Doctor Patient Privilege
Doctor Patient Privilege
United States v. Tome; physician patient privilege; statement to physician; hearsay rule; information required for diagnosis or treatment; Fed. R. Evid. 803(4).