Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  United States v. Ince
United States v. Ince
United States v. Ince Cartoons

United States v. Ince

Hearsay; hearsay exception; prior inconsistent statements; inadmissible confession; past recollection recorded.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

White v. Illinois
White v. Illinois
Excited utterance. Confrontation Clause does not require a showing of necessity before statements may be admitted under a hearsay exception.
Bruton v. United States
Bruton v. United States
Admission of joint defendants' confession violates other defendants rights under Confrontation Clause, even if limiting instruction is given to jury. Cautionary instruction.
Jinro America Inc. v. Secure Investments, Inc.
Jinro America Inc. v. Secure Investments, Inc.
Expert testimony must be confined to area of witness expertise. Bifurcated trial.
State v. Kinney
State v. Kinney
Trial courts may admit expert testimony if reliability of evidence equals that of other technical evidence held to be admissible and evaluation of other courts allowing admission of evidence is complete and persuasive. Judicial notice; plain error.
Seiler v. Lucasfilm
Seiler v. Lucasfilm
Best evidence rule. When contents of written document or equivalent are at issue, contents must be proved by original document unless original is unavailable for some reason that is not fault of proponent. Infringement.
Demonstrative Evidence
Demonstrative Evidence
Commonwealth v. Serge; computer-generated animation is admissible if fair and accurate representation of evidence, relevant under the rules of evidence, and its probative value is not outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; undue prejudice.
Hypnotism Not Allowed To Refresh Memory
Hypnotism Not Allowed To Refresh Memory
State v. Moore; The hypnotically refreshed testimony of a witness in a criminal trial is generally inadmissible.
Judicial Notice of Fact
Judicial Notice of Fact
Fielding v. State; When a court takes judicial notice of a fact in a criminal case, the court must instruct the jury that it may, but is not required to, accept as conclusive any fact so judicially noticed; directed verdict; harmless error; jury instruction.
Client Identities Are Not Attorney Client Privilege
Client Identities Are Not Attorney Client Privilege
In Re Osterhoudt; Identity of attorney's client and nature of fee agreement are not protected by attorney-client privilege, unless disclosure of the information would implicate the client in the criminal activity for which legal advice was sought.
Marital Privilege
Marital Privilege
United States v. Montgomery; the marital communications privilege applies to all private communications between spouses in a valid marriage unless evidence shows they were not intended to be confidential.
Best Evidence Rule Computer Records
Best Evidence Rule Computer Records
United States v. Diaz-Lopez; best evidence rule does not apply to testimony that records have been examined and found not to contain any reference to a designated matter.
Improper Testimony
Improper Testimony
United States v. Moore; admission of improper testimony does not always result in reversal of conviction; inadmissible evidence; appeal; corroborating evidence.

Browse Similar Items