Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Torts  >  Violation of Statute May Be Negligence Per Se
Violation of Statute May Be Negligence Per Se
Violation of Statute May Be Negligence Per Se Cartoons

Violation of Statute May Be Negligence Per Se

O'Guin v. Bingham County; to replace a common law duty of care with a duty of care from a statute or regulation, the statute or regulation must clearly define the required standard of conduct, be intended to prevent the same type of harm.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

The Medical Devise Amendments Prempt State Law
The Medical Devise Amendments Prempt State Law
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.; The Medical Device Amendments preempt state requirements that are different from, or in addition to, any requirements applicable to a medical device under federal law; preemption.
Student Acting Under Doctor Authority Does Not Commit Battery
Student Acting Under Doctor Authority Does Not Commit Battery
Mullins v. Parkview Hospital, Inc; In order to state a claim for battery, the plaintiff must show that the defendant acted intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the plaintiff.
Proximate Cause in Negligence Action
Proximate Cause in Negligence Action
Hale v. Ostrow; negligence claim requires proof by preponderance of evidence of both causation in fact and proximate causation; both generally involve questions of fact for jury unless uncontroverted facts or all reasonable inferences; but-for-cause.
Schools Have a Duty to Protect Students
Schools Have a Duty to Protect Students
Christensen v. Royal School District No. 160; Contributory fault may not be assessed against thirteen-year-old child based on failure to protect from sexual abuse when defendant stands in special relationship to child and has duty to protect child.
Proximate Cause Only If Foreseeable
Proximate Cause Only If Foreseeable
Hebert v. Enos. Summary judgment is appropriate if the plaintiff's injuries were not a foreseeable result of the defendant's negligence.
Liability for Tree Damage
Liability for Tree Damage
Michalson v. Nutting. A landowner is at liberty to use his land, and all of it, to grow trees and is not liable for damage caused by the natural and reasonable extensions of boughs and penetration of roots over and into adjoining property.
Res Ipsa Loquitur in Med Mal
Res Ipsa Loquitur in Med Mal
Sides v. St. Anthony's Medical Center. A plaintiff in a medical malpractice case can use res ipsa loquitur theory where the plaintiff offers a medical expert's opinion that the injury would not have occurred in the absence of negligence by the defendant.
Loss of Chance In Medical Malpractice
Loss of Chance In Medical Malpractice
Matsuyama v. Birnbaum. When a physician's negligence reduces or eliminates the patient's prospects for achieving a more favorable medical outcome, the physician has harmed the patient and is liable for damages. Wrongful Death Action.
Stealing Electronic Records
Stealing Electronic Records
Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. Electronic records are subject to the common law tort of conversion.
No Duty to Assist
No Duty to Assist
Estate of Cilley v. Lane; Maine law does not impose a general obligation to protect others from harm not created by the actor.
Substantial Factor Test for Causation
Substantial Factor Test for Causation
Lasley v. Combined Transport, Inc.; factual cause exists if someone examining the event without regard to legal consequences would conclude that the allegedly faulty conduct or condition in fact played a role in its occurrence.
Online Defamation
Online Defamation
Blumenthal v. Drudge; Under the Communications Decency Act, no provider or user of interactive computer service treated as publisher or speaker of information provided by another content provider for tort liability. ISP. Internet Service Provider.